StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Law on Ownership of Dangerous Animals - Essay Example

Summary
The paper "The Law on Ownership of Dangerous Animals" highlights that generally, dangerous animals are harmful to the general masses through their bites or second host for a number of nematodes and arthropods which are again harmful to human beings…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.2% of users find it useful

Extract of sample "The Law on Ownership of Dangerous Animals"

Title: The law on ownership of dangerous animals Dated: April 08, 2009. Introduction: The dangerous animals and their possession in England and the Ireland is regulated through a set of laws and regulations for the safety and security of both the animal owner and the animals along with the protection of the general masses as from the dangerous act of these animals. Animals as an important creature in the nature are contributing their due role in the food chain and providing their effective in the whole social system as existing at the world over. The countries have evolved a set of laws so as to protect the lives of the animals through the provision of medicine and other related facilities in their states of disease or any other infection both infectious and of normal routine type. Control of dogs Act, 1986 in Ireland and the Dog Bite Law in England are regulating the ownership of the dangerous animals in both these countries with their effective enforcement plans. The objective of these laws is to ensure security and safety of all the stakeholders especially of the general population from the harmful impacts of the dangerous animals. Moreover, the owners of form animals are required to fence their animals within their authorized and owned premise for the safety and protection of the property from the harmful impacts of their animals. The animals are exercising and discharging their behaviors as on the basis of their genetic makeup as acquired from their parents, the instincts and the learning behavior as incorporated in their developmental mechanisms, however, at occasions the dangerous animals are displaying their unwanted actions and finally damage the lives and property of the others. The laws as enforced in England and Ireland will help the owners to keep their animals intact and to mold their patterns for the protection of general masses from the harmful tactics of the dangerous animals. Dogs are considered as dangerous animals at the occasions when these domesticated animals are biting the general people through their acts of bite. These bites are having the potential to initiate a set of viral and bacterial diseases in their victims. The national governments and the municipal authorities are taking necessary steps to implement the relevant laws for the protection of the potential victims of these dog bites. The legal and administrative steps are helping the law enforcement agencies to discharge their functions and assignments as to protect the citizens from the harmful impacts of the dangerous animals. The degrees of danger vary from mild to medium and finally of extreme nature and the relevant provisions of the animal laws are dealing with the positions as to protect the victims from the dangerous animals. The law on ownership of dangerous animals in England: The "one bite rule," "first bite rule," and "one free bite rule" in England are the different names for a legal procedure and doctrine that determines whether the owner of a domestic animal that is dog can be held legally liable for injuries caused by the harmful act of that animal. These rules are providing a set of procedure to the owners of the dangerous animals to deal with the scenario as to fit the acts of bites as made by the dogs. The first time that a canine attacks a human being is dealt through a paramount legal practice which the state is having in its jurisdiction which adheres to the English common law which pertains to the injuries as inflicted by the domestic animals. The common law has shielded the owner of domesticated animals from civil liability to the first victim of each of his/ her animal from the legal proceedings. This absolving principle came to be known differently as the "one bite rule," the "first bite rule," or the "first bite free" rule as a result from the dangerous animal and from the ownership of that dangerous animal. However, it has regularly been stated in the court decisions that the name of "one-bite rule" is a misnomer in the legal course and in that the rule applies to any type of injury whether or not it was caused by a bite, and that the proof of the dangerous propensity of the animal does not demand the existence of a prior bite even in a biting case from the dangerous dog. The logic and rationale of the one bite rule was that the domestic animals by definition were not treated as injurious, and therefore, the liability could be predicated only on the defendant's knowledge about the animal that had a propensity to behave in illogical and with abnormal manner that was injurious to humans. English common law has strict liability for the canine inflicted injuries upon the victims of the bites of the dogs, therefore, the same was founded on the defendant's scienter  of his /her dog's dangerous act of bite ness. The dog bite statutes vary in different parts of the world for their dealing with the owners and the victims for their protection. They might provide for full compensation to the victims or payments just equivalents to the medical bills, or payment of the medical bills and other economic losses or double compensation under some special circumstances. The compensations are provided to the victims by the owners of the dangerous acts of their animals so as to realize them to tackle the animals with great care precaution for the betterment of all the people from the dangerous steps so as to limit the bites of the animals. In addition to the civil laws, the criminal laws which apply to the owners in relation to their animals keeps the dogs in a safer mode and are generally based upon the principle of one-bite and in such type of situation where the criminal liability usually does not emerge from the dog attacks unless the dog previously engaged in similar biting behavior. In Ireland: In Ireland Control of Dogs Act, 1986 regulates the ownership of the dangerous animals in the country from their harmful biting acts. In the act the damage is treated as a death or an injury that has resulted from the result of a dog bite to a person that has resulted in the shape of an injury or as impression of injury to the victim and the position is treated so as to a safer place for the owners as well as of the victims from the dog bites. The domestication of dogs is regulated through the issuance of a valid license for a dog. The steps are introduced for the creation of a sense of ownership as well as of responsibilities on the part of the owners of the dog so as to make a perfect environment for the entire stakeholder including the owners of the dog in satisfactory mechanism. These licenses are valid for the period of their validity and in places like streets, parks, roads and similar other public places for safer survival of the dogs. Section 2 of the Act provides the conditions for keeping a dog with a valid license for a dog for its possession for a specific period of time with a valid license. The section also provides a mechanism for the transfer of dog to a person who has also a valid license for keeping a dog. Mechanisms and arrangements have been identified for keeping a dog, having a dog and transferring a dog from one person's possession to another person's custody with or without valid consent of both the parties. The issuance of license has been designed with a set of requirement for the fulfillment of the conditions in this regard. The license is issued by the local authorities for the functional areas in which the dog is kept during the period of license for a dog. The license is valid for the functional areas of the issuing local authority and the local authority, with the consent of the minister may enter into an arrangement with any other person for the issue of license on its behalf for a specific period of the license and deemed for all purposes to be a license issued under this Act. The demand for a license requires a set of qualifications as to be possessed by the applicant like the same may be equivalent or above the age of sixteen years, and who has not disqualified in pursuance of section 18 of this Act, from keeping a dog. The transfer of the license is permissible as and when required by the owner of the license along with the dog. The step has been introduced to make the procedure simple but essential for keeping a dangerous animal in the possession of the owner of the dog. The legal and administrative measure as indicated above are designed for keeping the dangerous animal with safe and secure mode of the possession of such type of animals with great care and responsibilities in the countries of the world including the United Kingdom and Ireland. The legal documents will facilitate the owners to deal with the issues of first bite or the subsequent bites of their respective dangerous animals. The practice as adopted by the countries like United Kingdom and Ireland are the models for similar type of countries for the possession of dangerous animals like snakes, reptiles and mammals. Conclusion: The dangerous animals are harmful to the general masses through their bites or second host for a number of nematodes and arthropods which are again harmful to the human beings. The general masses recommended observing the statuary conditions for keeping their domesticated animals. Animal behavior is studied with a set of practices and the learning process for a specific time period. Careful examination of the learning process of the dangerous animals in the shape of the feedback mechanisms and its reporting for the animals like cats and dogs is an essential step for keeping the animals in perfect modes. It is also recommended that owners of the dangerous animals may like to introduce the dangers as associated with these domesticated animals to the general masses. All the stakeholders may like to follow the relevant provisions of the local and national laws so as to benefit the holders of dangerous animals in the shape of safe and secure possession of these animals. The shield as provided by the relevant laws is helpful in keeping the dangerous animals in safe modes with the observance of rules and regulations along with a secure and safe environment for the victims of the dangerous animals(1). Reference: 1. Brody, David C.; Acker, James R.; Logan, Wayne A. (2000). "Introduction to the Study of Criminal Law". Criminal Law. Jones & Bartlett Publishers. ISBN 0-834-21083-5. Read More

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Law on Ownership of Dangerous Animals

Dog Bite Law - The Diane Whipple Case

Noel and Knoller were fully aware that these particular dogs had bitten people and animals, but neither took precautions to protect someone like Whipple.... The final basis of recovery was common law and liability for keeping a dog that has dangerous tendencies.... If Noel and Knoller had known that the dogs Bane and Hera had dangerous traits to kill and attack a person, then both could be held accountable.... In order for landlords and property managers to be held accountable, they would need to have actual knowledge that the dogs had bitten another person or exhibited dangerous tendencies....
4 Pages (1000 words) Research Paper

Gun Control Issues

This research paper "Gun Control Issues" presents gun ownership as a serious responsibility.... While guns may be treated with a villainous impact by some, gun ownership also has certain benefits that should be accounted for.... The US Constitution provides a certain degree of allowance for gun ownership.... Thus, the positive effects of gun ownership have actually been foreseen by the great wisdom of our predecessors.... This should be able to provide a certain degree of justification for gun ownership in today's day and age....
4 Pages (1000 words) Research Paper

CyberTorts, Strict Liability, Products Liability, Consumer Protection

In cases of harm caused by animals, strict liability is not usually imposed on owners unless by legislation or it can be shown the owner knew of the animals' propensity to cause harm or it is considered a wild animal or did not take appropriate steps to restrain them.... They are considered especially dangerous because of the global reach of the internet and the potential for source anonymity.... In a products liability case where strict liability has been imposed by legislation because the product is inherently dangerous, purchasers of the product and injured others only have to prove the item was defective, that the defect caused the injury and the defect rendered the product inherently dangerous, even if the defendant exercised utmost care and was not negligent....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Bringing Wolves Back into the Wild

Wolf Haven International is also largely responsible for the advocacy of the wolf restoration programs and for their implementation once the law has already approved them.... The paper "Bringing Wolves Back into the Wild" promotes the organization Wolf Haven International which seeks to 'conserve and protect wolves and their habitat' and it does so by providing sanctuary, education, and conservation of the C....
12 Pages (3000 words) Research Paper

Introduction to Law

The specialty of Tort law has grown up to be of a separate domain with the inclusion of the beasts even under the jurisdiction of the law.... The damages of injuries caused by the animals strictly fall under the jurisdiction of the law.... This section of the law defines fraud under three situations i.... The strict liability for animals covers the damages caused by them to any collective property.... This essay "Introduction to law" focuses on Clark, a private individual who displayed a recently repaired long-case clock for sale....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Effects of Control on Animal Cruelty

Together these findings suggest that pet owners who lacked self-control have a higher chance of abusing animals.... The result of this research offers several possibilities in predicting and preventing behaviour that could jeopardize the safety of domesticated animals.... Unfortunately, such dominance of homo sapiens over animals can bring the worst in certain people through the action of animal cruelty.... This research improves existing practices by recommending basic behavioural questionnaires prior to pet ownership, to determine the suitability of ownership based on levels of self-control....
22 Pages (5500 words) Research Paper

Care and Feeding of Exotic Pets

The author states that the moral and ethical concerns that such an action portend are far greater than the need to accessorize one's life with animals that were never intended to be kept as pets.... In the essay 'Care and Feeding of Exotic Pets' the author discusses a pet that is not typically thought of as a pet and/or is not supposed to be kept in such a way....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Do Animals Have Rights

This thesis proposal "Do animals Have Rights" presents animal rights that are important for their protection because the life of animals continuously subjected to risks without some basic rights.... The supporters of animal rights have stated that animals must not be used for experimentations or for amusement purposes.... Since animals are sane organisms, they must have rights of freedom according to ethics.... There are many people who believe that the use of animals for medical research is essential in order to prevent deadly diseases from spreading in the world Apart from animal experiments, there are several ill-treatments that animals experience on a high scale in the world....
8 Pages (2000 words) Thesis Proposal
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us