StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Correspondence Theory of Truth vs. Coherence Theory of Truth - Coursework Example

Summary
"Correspondence Theory of Truth vs. Coherence Theory of Truth" paper focuses on a corresponding theory that defines truth from a substantive point of view in which the aforesaid property is entrenched in the relation between its bearer and something else…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.7% of users find it useful

Extract of sample "Correspondence Theory of Truth vs. Coherence Theory of Truth"

Correspondence Theory of Truth vs. Coherence Theory of Truth Student’s Name: Institution: Instructor: Course: Correspondence Theory of Truth vs. Coherence Theory of Truth Introduction Several theories for instance correspondence theory, coherence theory and pragmatic theory have been proposed with the main objective being to explain what ‘truth’ is. However, the first to theories receives much attention from both their proponents and opponents. In this respect, this research essay focuses on comparing and contrasting between corresponding theory and coherence theory of truth with regard to their strengths and weaknesses. According to Newman, (2002), the correspondence theory is the most insightful theory of truth in that it correlates truth to reality. This theory argues that a particular statement is true on condition that what it illustrates is real. As such, truth is then argued to that it correspond to the known facts. In their work, Young (2009) argues that corresponding theory of truth is one of substantive theories in whereby truth is regarded as a property that is used to explain major theories. Therefore, corresponding theory defines truth from substantive point of view in which the aforesaid property is entrenched in the relation between its bearer and something else. This kind of relation considered to be correspondence. On the other hand, the coherence theory refers to truth as being a mere coherence as influenced by a person’s beliefs in his/her mind. In comparison, whereas coherence implies that truth as a ‘correspondence with the facts of the mind’, correspondence theory implies that truth is a ‘correspondence with the facts of the world’ (Dorsey, 2006). Characteristics of Substantial Theories As mentioned in the above section, coherence and corresponding theories are collectively called substantial theories. These theories hold that there is more what can be deduced from a sentence by considering the difference between a false statement and true one. One characteristic feature of these theories is that they aim at identifying a property from several statements in order to classify in to either false or true statements. The basic features targeted at from statements are both the actual facts (for instance, ‘the Pentagon is located in Washington DC’) and the mere facts that something might be true (for instance World Trade Center is located in New York). In this respect, both coherence and corresponding theories of truth are concurrence that true statements are rendered true by something real whereas on the other hand, false issues or things are not. Nevertheless, these two theories differ in instances where they are applied to explain what renders true statements to be true. In this regard, corresponding theory, in some cases called realism theory, is referred to. According to Patterson (2003), corresponding theory argue that true statements are rendered true by something objective and real. Generally, characteristic feature is referred to as state of affairs. As such, in respect to corresponding theory of truth, by being objective and real, there is independent occurrence of state of affairs from the capacity of speakers which can give clue of their they are in existence. Based on the fact that correspondence theory stipulates that statements are rendered true only by objective state of affairs, the theory supports the concept of transcendence. In regard to the principle of transcendence, particular statements are rendered true by a specific state of affairs even in cases where the speakers are not in apposition to gauge the truth in the statement. Furthermore, the corresponding theory also supports the concept of bivalence which argues that every statement can either be true or false. For instance, in situations where state of affairs that make particular statements true are obtained, then such statements are true. On the other hand, if they are not, the statements are false. Subsequently, the coherence theory has a characteristic feature of being anti-realist or epistemic. As such, statements are cause to be true by proof and ‘not by an objective state of affairs’. In other words, the statements establish that there is a precise proof relating to the statement. In this regard, coherence theory specifies that statements are true as long as or condition that it is entrenched in s system of one’s beliefs. A case in point to explain coherence theory is intuitionism explanation of a certain subject in which case it is seen as to being limited to the specific subject. Arguments For and Against Corresponding Theory of Truth According to Kuukkanen (2007), the corresponding theory of truth receives a lot of criticism although majority of its opponents do not have valid reasons. However, opponents to this theory argues that there has been no-independent means to put forward such phrases such as ‘really there’. Thus, there is no relation between the theory and the real-life encounters. Conversely, this is critiqued in that, even in situations where reality and theory are compared, there is no hint that truth is entailed in our corresponding relationship that truth among our autonomous world and some theories and beliefs hence, Lehrer (2005), argues that corresponding theory provides and explanation of what the truth is without putting into consideration the epistemic concern in regard to knowing the level of truth in statement. Subsequently, Woller (2003), in their work agues that correspondence theory is only robust in defining what is truth. Reason being the corresponding theory fails to facilitate confronting facts. Thus according to Kuukkanen (2007), corresponding theory does not facilitate in making informed decisions as to whether or not a particular statement could be true or not. On the other hand, the authors argues that correspondence theory of truth lacks proper criteriological order hence the theory cannot serve the purpose of as it is not viable. Therefore, correspondence between reality and beliefs is not applicable in explaining some theories beliefs. As such, Kuukkanen (2007) argues notes the need of having other ways in which an informed decision can be made. Contrary, corresponding theory of truth is favorable in that, it has a characteristic attribute of obviousness. Nevertheless, objections against this theory are that it is too trial, obvious and vacuous as well as being too obscure. Nevertheless, although corresponding theory emphasizes that the notion statements are true if and only if they correspond to reality, it has few limitations; there are few limitations; verifying statements involves subjective experiences to both observations and required interpretations and there are claims (either very or vey small) that cast doubts as to anyone with the necessary equipment. Hence, the coherence theory of truth is proposed. Arguments for and against coherence theory According to Kuukkanen (2007), the coherence theory of truth entails historical, developmental and developmental perspectives based on epistemological point of view. The historical perspective borrows heavily for scientific history. For instance, majority of people all-over the world believe that that the world has existed in more than a billion years ago. This leads to people developing beliefs in respect to certain things. Unlike to correspond theory, it is possible to character the in a least two ways –explanatory unity ad consistency unity. As such, an individual’s belief becomes coherent if it is logically consistent. In order to increase coherence within system of beliefs and besides, the coherence of system of beliefs is reduced by dividing it into subsystems. Besides, it is as well possible to decrease the coherence of belief in order to cater for unexpected. As such, Kuukkanen (2007), three factors that have to be considered in determining systems’ coherence include; consistency, level of inferential connections and cases of anomalies. According to Thagard (2007), coherence theory encompasses two a few advantages which has led to its wide adaption. First coherent theory facilitates both epistemological and metaphysical routes to coherencies. In other words, truth is a property of correlated consistent statements such as science and mathematics and it is as well a systematic coherence of propositions interconnected with beliefs. However, limitations of coherence theory include: possibility of consistent error i.e. what would happen in case other statements are false. On the other hand, coherence theory involves correspondence based on the reason that initial decisions are directly verified. Conclusion In respect to the above discussion, there is a lot of evidence that argument against corresponding theory of truth is to some extent epistemological. Reason being it is difficult to evaluate correspondence between reality and beliefs using correspondence theory truth. As such, making use of coherence theory is much better as it increases coherence by linking it to the truth. On the other hand, coherence theory entails historical perspective of someone’s beliefs. On the other hand, coherence seems to be an inter-link of trustworthiness, truth connection and actual acceptances. References Dorsey, D. (2006). A coherence theory of truth in ethics. Philosophical Studies, 127, 493–523. Kuukkanen, J. M. (2007) Kuhn, the correspondence theory of truth and coherentist epistemology. Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci, 38, 555–566. Lehrer, K. (2005). Coherence and the truth connection. Erkenntnis, 63, 413–423. Newman, A. (2002). The Correspondence Theory of Truth: An Essay on the Metaphysics of Predication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Thagard, P. (2007). Coherence, Truth, and the Development of Scientific Knowledge. Philosophy of Science, 74(1), 20-100. Woller, R. (2003). The Correspondence Theory of Truth: An Essay on the Metaphysics of Predication. The Review of Metaphysics, 57(1), 167-168. Young, J. O. (2009). Truth, correspondence and deflationism. Front. Philos. China, 4(4), 563–575. Patterson, D. (2003). What is a correspondence theory of truth? Synthese, 137, 421–444. Read More

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Correspondence Theory of Truth vs. Coherence Theory of Truth

Davidsons Coherence Theory.Coherence and Skepticism

he coherence theory of truth and Knowledge ... The Coherence of truth is part of the series of essays that Donald Davidson wrote, which made him one of the most important philosophers of the twentieth century.... The Coherence of truth is part of the series of essays that Donald Davidson wrote, which made him one of the most important philosophers of the twentieth century.... 316), coherence theorists focus on the nature of truth as guarantee the link between the belief and truth, arguing that “what makes for truth is simply some property of a set of beliefs, namely, coherence....
14 Pages (3500 words) Essay

Reading Comprehension Epistemology

EMPIRICAL claims there are four different theories concerning the determination of the truth of empirical claims: correspondence theory of truth Coherence theory Pragmatist theory Scientific Theory Describe each of these four theories for proving empirical claims to be true.... Correspondence theory is an empirical theory of truth that was espoused by Aristotle that holds that truth is what propositions are consequent to away things in the world are.... The two theories of truth that can be considered here would be Empiricism and Pragmatism....
7 Pages (1750 words) Assignment

Hitchens Philosophy on Evidence

This assertion implies that the judgment of truth may in fact not be truth (Net Industries, 2012).... This implies that when this proposal is applied to the definition of truth, a belief can only be true so far as it satisfies the practicality of its objects.... However, knowledge can be attributed as evidence: to the extent that such known concept is true, inconsistency with the knowledge of an individual would amount to inconsistencies with some form of truth (Kelly, 2006)....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

An Evaluation of William Jamess Theory of Pragmatic Truth

This essay takes a critical look at William James's pragmatic theory of truth.... The pragmatic theory of truth is a philosophical theory which states that something is true if it is useful to believe that the concept is true (The Mead Project).... Because of this, the concept of truth has been of interest to many philosophers who have presented various theories about truth.... Apart from psychology, William James's other concerns have been religion and an understanding of truth....
13 Pages (3250 words) Report

Knowledge, Truth, Belief

3Joachim response to his critics who suggest that coherence theory of truth has no bearing on the way the world is in, and of itself is that his sketch was intended to show the truth of nature as ideal.... correspondence theory of truth is a relationship between a statement and a fact.... Coherent theory of truth solves this problem through transforming correspondence statement and facts into coherence amid statement.... Coherent theory of truth solves this problem through transforming correspondence statement and facts into coherence amid statement....
1 Pages (250 words) Assignment

Theory of Truth in Business

The business will not thrive under the correspondence theory of truth.... The correspondence theory of truth was advocated in the early 20th century by Russell and Moore.... This assignment "theory of truth in Business" analyses the measure of truth that is the owner's preference, not the consumers', and the objective of the business – to satisfy the customer.... Truth is defined in many ways through many criteria, and in some cases, the existence of truth is even denied....
5 Pages (1250 words) Assignment

Which Theorie of Truth Is the Most Credible

This essay "Which Theorie of truth Is the Most Credible" does a deep analysis of the three theories and validate my dissertation that the correspondence theory is the strongest of all the theories.... The debate has led to the generation of theories of truth.... Cowan and Spiegel name three major hypotheses of truth: the correspondence theory, coherence theory and the pragmatic theory.... However, this assumes a correspondence view of truth in that the predictive proposition-ceasefire agreement by the end of 2013-is indeed verified by the happening of the results as predicted....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

The Definition of Truth

From the paper "The Definition of truth" it is clear that truth is indeed an indefinable concept.... The arguments of various philosophers make the concept of truth an increasingly interesting subject to explore.... Theories of truth have been formulated in an attempt to answer the question of truth.... artin Heidegger partly supports the theory of correspondence that equates truth with correspondence where judgment is the locus of truth (Dreyfus, 200)....
7 Pages (1750 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us