StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Meaning of Modernity According to Modern Political Theorists - Term Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
The author of the "Meaning of Modernity According to Modern Political Theorists" paper focuses on how modern political philosophers have defined modernity. The definition of modernity is an issue of massive controversy and is subject to a lot of debate…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.7% of users find it useful
Meaning of Modernity According to Modern Political Theorists
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Meaning of Modernity According to Modern Political Theorists"

Meaning of Modernity According to Modern Political Theorists Introduction Modernity has been defined differently by different theorists and commentators. The definition of modernity as it applies in the social, political, and philosophical arenas has been subject to change over time. While in sociology, modernity is often associated with industrial revolution (Eyerman and Jamison 1991, p. 74), politically, it has a lot to do with the shift from feudalism to nation-state. Further, modernity in philosophical terms is associated with the loss of certainty and the impossibility of establishing certainty ultimately. In lay terms, modernity is associated with modernism and the modern era. In consideration of the above definitions, it may be well taken that modernity refers to a historical period that is post medieval and post traditional – one that is marked by the shift from feudalism toward nation-state, industrialization, rationalization, capitalism, and secularization (Carp 1979, p. 64). To-date, the definition of modernity is an issue of massive controversy and is subject to a lot of debate. This being the case, this paper will focus on how modern political philosophers have defined modernity. History and Characteristic of Modernity The history of modernity is as controversial as its definition. While some argue that modernity started in the 18th century or during the age of Enlightenment, others note that the beginning of modernity run as far back as the 1500s, during the age of Western imperialism (Merton 1949, p. 34). Worth noting at this point is the fact that while modernity seemingly refers specifically to the social relations that are associated with the rise of capitalism, the Enlightenment has a lot to do with a Western philosophy movement (Carp 1979, p. 103). Yet again, others claim that modernity began during or around the 1400s, with the invention of the printing press. Generally, modernity has been divided into three main phases based on historical period namely; early, classical and late modernity. There are many characteristics that have been assigned to the establishment of the modern era. The main characteristics in this respect include the rise of the nation state, industrialization, urbanization, rise of capitalism and mercantilism, and mass literacy (dbu.edu n.d,par. 1). Other characteristics include emergence of countries founded on socialist ideals, growth of mass media, developments in science and technology, increase in the appreciation of representative democracy, and the discovery and colonization of lands beyond the Western world (dbu.edu n.d,par. 2). In addition to the characteristics aforementioned, other facets of modernity include emancipation, establishment of modern psychology, early existentialism and romanticism, and evolutionary thinking in different disciplines (dbu.edu n.d,par. 3). Karl Marx and Engels Views on Modernity Karl Marx’s notion of modernity was a result of the play of three major developments that occurred in his lifetime. The three events included the French revolutions (1789 and 1848), the collapse of the intellectual credibility of the church, and the agrarian and industrial revolutions (Dorobantu 2008, par. 1). Karl thought about a new era that resulted from the three events leading to the future. At the time of his demise, a large majority of European states were under the rule of monarchs and most of the population of Europe attended church. In Marx’s view, as presented by the Communist Manifesto of which he was an author, capitalism was a means toward the realisation of ultimate modernity – stateless communism (Dorobantu 2008, par. 3). In the Manifesto, Marx gives a lot of tribute to the bourgeoisie who revolutionised the world. The bourgeoisie changed the face of the world, established urban centres, centralised political power, and moved the masses from their rural settings to work in industries, and expended their markets continuously as noted by Dorobantu (2008, par. 4). Marx distinguishes people and their interests through class as presented in his notion of landlords, capitalists, and wage labourers - characteristic of the capitalist society. As the bourgeoisie develop in the capitalist society, so does a proletariat lot. The proletariat in this case consists of persons who own no property and have to work to work for the capitalists to earn a living. The capitalist society was immediately preceded by an aristocratic society and much earlier preceded by a feudal economy according to Marx Dorobantu (2008, par. 6). Karl Marx and Engels saw the modern era as one that pointed to novel sense of historical possibility as noted by Eyerman (1981). They perceived not the modern era as only one that was characterized by the proliferation of forms of social existence that were degrading as brought about by the industrialization of urban centres. The two philosophers noted that modernity led to the establishment of a novel appreciation of historical change. Better stated, it led to the development of historical consciousness which involved a vision to absolutely undo and, in fact, negate the world order in existence. Essentially, Marx and Engels hold that what defines the modern era is the new period of history that it establishes. Essentially, Marx notes that a modern person is one who has the conviction or ethos to see beyond the superficial nature of things, revolutions in history included. Immanuel Kant’s Views on Modernity Immanuel Kant was a prominent German philosopher who lived in the 18th century and early 19th century (Broad, 1978). Kant contributed immensely to modern philosophy and greatly influenced many thinkers of his time. His thoughts occupy the minds of today’s philosophers, historians, and even scientists. According to Kant, modernity encompassed an era in which the state was founded on law and peace everlasting. In other words, according to Kant, modern states are to be legally constituted and governed. Modernity in Kant’s view is characterised by the respect for human rights by the state. A modern state in his view thus is one that assures people of their fundamental rights and freedoms, and enhances them (Broad, 1978). Kant also viewed direct democracy as being not ideal for the government of a modern state. He noted that when the majority’s will is upheld, the will of the minority is ignored and their rights trampled upon. He further noted that equality for all individuals should characterised modern society. Kant believed that the problems that face modernity could be alleviated by “Ausgang” as noted by Broad (1978). He believed that the freedom that modernity presented did not assure the fulfilment and autonomy that it initially promised but instead led to the disappearance of whatever was considered heroic. While modernity may have grown under the “Aude Sapere” banner. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel and Modernity Friedrich Hegel was a philosopher and a major force behind German idealism. He believed in a system of absolute idealism that involved the integration of different things for the realisation of development (Scruton 1990, p. 84). Hegel is one of the modern political theorists that have commented about modernity. His philosophy holds it that the universal (the ideal) can be actualised and externalized only through an individual (Inwood 1983, p. 54). The universal is inherently unified in form and content and blissfully responds to self sufficiency. The Ideal stands in great contrast to the chaotic world and demands a reformation. In Hegel’s view, the problems that face modernity come about in the event that the universal has absolutely and successfully externalised itself through law. In the modern era, according to Hegel, people do not live in a state of nature in which fear and lawlessness reign supreme (Inwood 1983, p. 61). The institution of a legal framework that gives people the freedom of expression and freedom to pursue personal interests as long as they are aligned to public interests characterise a modern society in Hegel’s view (Gillian, 1981, p. 46). The individual’s role in a modern society is to be subject to the modern state so that when he/she works against the state and proves to be a danger to it, they should be punished for the sake of correction. In Hegels’ view the continual specialization and diversification of the modern society has seen humans’ influential sphere massively reduce from the level it was during the pre-modern era (Inwood 1983, p. 83). On its part the state has so tremendously grown so that it can not anymore be considered a single person’s action. As a result of these developments, individuals no longer appreciate the reasons for and effects of their actions and wish not to be held accountable for such actions and would rather share responsibility. Conclusion Different modern political theorists hold different views with respect to the beginning, effects and characteristics of modernity. Many of the political theorists including Karl Marx and Engels note that one of the characteristics of modernity is capitalism which has developed through a process. In their view, modernity is characterised by historical consciousness. Marx and Engels highlight many negative things that have come about as a result of modernity. Immanuel Kant on his part notes that the development of the nation state that is constitutionally governed characterises the modern era. Modernity in his view is characterised further by everlasting peace and respect for individual and human rights. Hegel’s view of modernity believes that modernity is characterised by freedom of expression and diminishing personal influence and power at the expense of the state’s development so that the individual is reduced to a punishable subject by state. References dbu.edu n.d, Definitions and Characteristics of Modernity, viewed 1 April, 2013 http://www3.dbu.edu/mitchell/modernit.htm Eyerman, R. 1981, False consciousness and ideology in Marxist theory, Almqvist and Wiksell and Humanities Press, Stockholm. Broad, C. 1978, Kant: an Introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Inwood, M. 1983, Hegel, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London. Gillian R. 1981, Hegel Contra Sociology, Athlone Press, New York. Scruton R., 1990, "Hegel as a conservative thinker" in The Philosopher on Dover Beach, Manchester: Carcanet Press, New York. Carp W., 1979, The working class in welfare capitalism, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London. Eyerman R. and Jamison, A. 1991, Social movements: A cognitive approach, Polity Press, Oxford, Merton, R. 1949, Social theory and social structure, Free Press, New York. Dorobantu I. 2008, Karl Marx and Modernity, viewed 1 April, 2013 http://www.inpolitics.ro/irina_b1/Karl-Marx-and-Modernity_22756.aspx Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Meaning of Modernity According to Modern Political Theorists Term Paper, n.d.)
Meaning of Modernity According to Modern Political Theorists Term Paper. https://studentshare.org/politics/1799393-how-have-modern-political-theorists-understood-the-meaning-of-modernity
(Meaning of Modernity According to Modern Political Theorists Term Paper)
Meaning of Modernity According to Modern Political Theorists Term Paper. https://studentshare.org/politics/1799393-how-have-modern-political-theorists-understood-the-meaning-of-modernity.
“Meaning of Modernity According to Modern Political Theorists Term Paper”. https://studentshare.org/politics/1799393-how-have-modern-political-theorists-understood-the-meaning-of-modernity.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Meaning of Modernity According to Modern Political Theorists

Marxism, Feminism and Postmodernism

according to Rizter (2000), Marxism refers to a social and economic system, which is based on the political and economic theories of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels.... according to Rizter (2000), Marxism refers to a social and economic system, which is based on the political and economic theories of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels....
19 Pages (4750 words) Essay

Theories of Nationalism

Nationalism, according to Smith, A.... In fact, there are some confusions in certain terminologies and postulates which need clarification like, would the meaning “nation” be synonymous with the meaning of a “state”?...  This paper seeks to present theories that may have unresolved arguments among theorists and historians which may give enlightenment to other issues on nationalism.... This research paper seeks to present here some of the weak and strong theorists' stand, perceptions and parameters which could give a clear and better understanding of unresolved issues for ethnonationalism and nationalismOnly conscientious, strong determined people of a nation sharing a consensus aspiration can bring its country to where it is today....
6 Pages (1500 words) Assignment

Advance organizational behaviour

One should try to find the meaning of life and should figure out the importance of human life.... These relate to Darwinist ideas that there should be evolution and evolvement of the theories for its survival in the modern world.... Postmodernism, then, as opposed to modernity is the dissolution of self....
9 Pages (2250 words) Coursework

Modernity and Spaces of Femininity

She has become an activist using a “Marxist-socialist approach to reveal the key sexual and political biases involved in the formation of the modernist movement".... Clark claims that Manet's Olympia has been the founding monument of modern art3, embodying a shift in what spectators are accustomed to viewing and was subjected to a wide variety of interpretations.... “Modernity is a matter of representations and major myths- of a new Paris for recreation, leisure and pleasure; of nature to be enjoyed at weekends in suburbia; of the prostitute taking over and of fluidity of class in the popular spaces of entertainment”5 References were pointed to Charles Baudelaire's essay about the modern artist being a flaneur or “...
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

From Modernism to Postmodernism in Arts Education

Among major modernists names like Theodor Adorno, a major figure in the Frankfurt School of Critical theorists, tells us that art and literature, and particularly Modernist art, could function as a kind of negative or contradictory criticism of society, in thought-provoking experimental texts.... Abbs (2003) has referred this paradigm to the shift that is related to thinking in the Education Institutes of British universities and is not to be identified with the atomistic and politically constructed National Curriculum, though many of the elements dislocated from their original meaning are reflected there (Abbs, 2003, p....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

The Post-Modern Condition

This paper ''The Post-modern Condition'' tells that Both modern and postmodern cultural orders create subjects who recognize to a historically unprecedented extent that language itself does not immediately reflect.... arly modern: Signs modify or screen reality, which is thereby acknowledged to be at least partially artificial or contingent.... modern: Signs dissimulate -- that is, they conceal the presence of absence....
21 Pages (5250 words) Essay

Sociology: Postmodernism and Modernism

hellip; Self-reflexivity is a feature of modernity where the self becomes a reflexive project.... Whoever lives by meaning dies by meaning (Browning 10 2000) Some theorists define post-modernism as an eclectic movement, originating in aesthetics, architecture, and philosophy.... In traditional societies reflexivity is limited to interpreting and applying traditional values -- an instance of the reflexive monitoring of action -- but in modern societies, the producer of action, the agent or the self, becomes the object of reflexivity....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

The Philosophical Foundations of Historical Inquiry

nbsp; Application of history to modern principles of living is the key to consciousness and the awakening to change.... according to Karl Popper (1962), “Recently, history has been interpreted not only as of the power of politics but also as a basic tool for imposing justice, freedom, equality, and control of international crime.... according to a historical philosopher Collingwood (1946), the work of historians is to have knowledge of the past, not the future; but utilize such knowledge to determine advancing occurrences....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us