StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

District Court or Circuit Court - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
Jerry Falwell (Defendant), in order to regain the use of his website, www.fallwell.com. The argument of the defendant was on the basis that his website, while being used as a “gripe site”, did…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.2% of users find it useful
District Court or Circuit Court
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "District Court or Circuit Court"

In December 2003, Christopher Lamparello (Plaintiff) brought suit against the Rev. Jerry Falwell (Defendant), in order to regain the use of his website, www.fallwell.com. The argument of the defendant was on the basis that his website, while being used as a “gripe site”, did not in any way harm or infringe on the website set up by the Plaintiff, and therefore he should be allowed to continue to operate it (Lamparello v. Falwell, 2004). Mr. Lamparello sued the Rev. Falwell and his conjunctive ministries first in the actions taken involving the District Court in the case of Lamparello v. Falwell. However, it should be noted that Rev.

Falwell had brought a complaint alleging that Mr. Lamparello was guilty of trademark infringement, which Rev. Falwell alleged was intellectual property that protected his website, as he had at least one registered trademark, even though it was not on the domain name www.falwell.com or www.fallwell.com (Atkinson, Sorkin, & Gold 2003). Rev. Falwell also stated that he had legal rights in the name “Falwell” which included “Listen America with Jerry Falwell”, a popular show, as well as a pending trademark on the name “Jerry Falwell”.

He therefore requested relief in the form of www.fallwell.com being transferred from Mr. Lamparello to his ministries and control, on the grounds of trademark infringement, false designation of origin, unfair competition, and cybersquatting (Atkinson et. al. 2003). Mr. Lamparello filed suit in the Eastern District Court of Virginia, accusing Rev. Falwell and his ministry of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking in violation of the Anticybersquatting Protection Act (Lamparello v. Falwell, 2004). This suit was filed in accordance with the Uniform Domain Name Dispute-Resolution Policy, commonly known as UDRP, which states that “most types of trademark-based domain-name disputes must be resolved by agreement, court action, or arbitration” (Internet corporation for, 2011).

The District Court ruled in favor of the defendant, finding that there was a likelihood of confusion based on the “distinctive and strong” presence of the Defendant’s trademark. The District Court also found trademark infringement was evident as the Defendant was able to prove that he did, indeed, have a registered trademark, and he had used that trademark. The appeals court, however, overturned the findings, stating that there was no trademark infringement or false designation of origin since Mr.

Lamparello did not intend to make money from his website, and used it only for “noncommercial” purposes (Lamparello v. Falwell, 2005). The Circuit Court further stated that there was no likelihood of confusion, since the two websites looked nothing like each other, and most importantly, did not offer similar goods and services (Lamparello v. Falwell, 2005). Indeed, the Circuit Court stated, they were widely differing on their opinions and viewpoints, and it possibly did not help Rev. Falwell’s argument that he also conceded, during oral arguments, that those viewing the content at www.fallwell.com were unlikely to confuse the two websites (Lamparello v.

Falwell, 2005). After careful review of these two cases, both the original that was heard in the District Court and the appeal, I find myself agreeing with the Appeals Court, and not the District Court. Though originally the District Court found in the case of Lamparello v. Falwell that trademark infringement was evident, as well as likelihood of confusion, I disagree. While it can be contended that “fallwell” and “Falwell” are indeed very similar in spelling and sound the same, Mr. Lamparello made no claims that his site was intending to, in any way, scam or use the name of Rev.

Falwell to do anything other than disagree with his viewpoints. Disagreeing and having opinions contrary to what another person thinks are not against the law to the best of my knowledge. It would have been easier to agree with the District Court if, in the case of Lamparello v. Falwell, Mr. Lamparello been using the website of Rev. Falwell to make money, or to make it seem as though he was allied with Rev. Falwell in some way. Since the advent of the internet becoming widespread, opinions from more and more people have been able to reach farther and farther into the corners of the world. Mr. Lamparello was simply expressing his opinion.

Also, it should be noted that Mr. Lamparello had a disclaimer on the front page of his website, stating explicitly that he was not involved in any way with Rev. Falwell, or his ministries. Mr. Lamparello even provided a link to the appropriate website for Rev. Falwell, should people have landed at the wrong website by mistake. He did not ask for advertising revenue for this service, nor did he make any claims that he was helping the Rev. Falwell direct more traffic to his website. He also attempted to make no money from the website www.fallwell.com; again, he was only using it to express his opinions, which, as stated before, is not a criminal action; if it were, more people than Mr.

Lamparello would be facing the court system. While it is possibly in bad taste to use the internet to shout one’s opinions to the world, Mr. Lamparello deserved to retain the domain name and the right to operate it, as the Circuit Court stated.Sources:Atkinson, T., Sorkin, D., & Gold, E. (2003, November 20). National arbitration forum. Retrieved from http://www.adrforum.com/domains/decisions/198936.htmInternet corporation for assigned names and numbers: uniform domain name dispute-resolution policy.

(2011, September 05). Retrieved from http://www.icann.org/en/udrp/udrp.htmLamparello v. Falwell, 360 F. Supp. 2d 768 (E.D. Va. 2004). Lamparello v. Falwell, 420 F.3d 309 (4th Cir. 2005)

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“District Court or Circuit Court Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
District Court or Circuit Court Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1580202-district-court-or-circuit-court
(District Court or Circuit Court Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
District Court or Circuit Court Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words. https://studentshare.org/law/1580202-district-court-or-circuit-court.
“District Court or Circuit Court Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1580202-district-court-or-circuit-court.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF District Court or Circuit Court

US Supreme Court Decision AT&T. versus Hulteen

The EEOC issued a notice of right to sue to the respondent and the CWA, after which Hulteen filed a suit in the United States district court for the Northern District of California.... The Procedure The suit never reached the district court at the first instance.... The instant case is a US Supreme court case in which the primary issue was to determine whether the Pregnancy Discrimination Act is violated by an employer, when pensions are calculated on the basis of accrual rule, giving less retirement credit for pregnancy than for medical leave… US Supreme court Case: AT & T....
8 Pages (2000 words) Research Paper

Bauman Decision in the Jurisdiction of the US

Plaintiffs brought a suit against DCAG in 2004 in the district court for the northern district of California under the Alien Tort Statute (ATS), and the Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA).... The defendants objected to these two documents and termed them as unauthenticated hearsay, but the district court dismissed the objection.... The service was authorized by a German trial court but was stayed by a German appellate so it could determine whether the process would infringe on Germany's sovereignty....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Courtroom proceedings

In a district court, the process of appeal begins by filing an appeal notice with the district court clerk within the duration provided by the law following the entry of the ruling sought to be reviewed.... A characteristic appeal from a district courtroom decision will comprise the district court record, oral arguments, as well as supporting arguments.... The purpose of this paper is to discuss the differences between County-Level Courts, District Courts, Courts of Appeal, Supreme court and court of Criminal Appeals....
4 Pages (1000 words) Research Paper

The High Court, the Crown Court & Magistrates Court

The most serious offences, such as murder, rape, and arson must be tried in the Crown court, a unitary court, which is part of the Supreme court and is a superior court of record.... Trials in the Crown court are presided over by a judge, who may be a High court judge, a circuit judge, a recorder, or an assistant recorder.... All offences which can be tried in the Crown court are known as indictable offences....
13 Pages (3250 words) Essay

State Court System In Indiana

Indiana has 92 counties, and 88 of these counties have their own circuit with their own circuit court.... Hence any appeal from these courts to superior or circuit courts, they are trialed as if they are appearing for the first time at these higher courts.... The constitution gives the judicial power of the state to a Supreme court, a court of Appeals, circuit courts, and any other courts that… Trial Courts and appellate courts makes up the two kinds of Indiana state courts....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

State judicial system

II The Federal Court System The lowest court level in the federal court system is the federal district court, of which every state and US territory has at least one.... There are usually two appellate courts: the court of appeal which reviews cases decided by lower Running Head: THE US JUDICIAL SYSTEM The US Judicial System The US Judicial System I The Courts Generally, state courts can be classified into trial courts and appellate courts.... There are usually two appellate courts: the court of appeal which reviews cases decided by lower courts, and; the state supreme court which is the highest state court....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Federal Court System

Below Supreme court, two levels of federal courts are functioning; trail courts or district courts and appellate courts.... The nine member Supreme court judges' panel consists of a… Supreme court normally functions based on the guidelines, passed by the Congress.... Under normal circumstances, Supreme court hears cases which were unresolved in trail courts, appellate courts and state courts.... Most of the cases appear in Federal court System Supreme court has the highest ity in American criminal justice system or federal judiciary....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Deciding to decide review

Lower courts determine their cases independently, but the Supreme court has to come in and handle petitions after they have been determined to be certworthy when need be.... Petitions filed at the Supreme court are… Cert.... The ultimate objective here is to Deciding to Decide Review Affiliation: The role played by the Supreme court is ultimately fundamental.... Lower courts determine their cases independently, but the Supreme court has to come in and handle petitions after they have been determined to be certworthy when need be....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us