StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Importance of the Parliament Acts of 1911 and 1949 - Assignment Example

Cite this document
Summary
In the paper “Importance of the Parliament Acts of 1911 and 1949” the author analyzes the Parliament Acts of 1911 and 1949, which are acts of parliament that are incorporated in the United Kingdom’s constitution and are sought to limit the legislation blocking powers…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95% of users find it useful
Importance of the Parliament Acts of 1911 and 1949
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Importance of the Parliament Acts of 1911 and 1949"

Importance of the Parliament Acts of 1911 and 1949 The Parliament Acts of 1911 and 1949 are acts of parliament that are incorporated in the United Kingdom’s constitution. The Parliament Acts of 1911 sought to limit the legislation blocking powers of the House of Lords, and allowed the House of Commons to pass legislations, without first obtaining the approval of the House of Lords.1 The act also amended the constitution and limited the lifespan of a parliament from 7years to 5years. When the Parliament Acts of 1949 was enacted, it served to amend the Parliament Acts of 1911, by reducing the duration the House Lords could delay Bills from two years to one-year period. 3 The two acts are important legislations, in that they limited the powers and the privileges wielded by the House of Lords, and sought to give the common person more powers through the empowerment of the House of Commons. The legislations are however not without issues, as demonstrated in the Jackson v Attorney General [2005] case regarding the legality of the application of Parliament Acts of 1911 and 1949 to pass the Hunting Act, making it illegal to hunt wild animals using dogs, except in very limited circumstances. 6The case was heard by a Divisional court and later passed on the court of appeal. The court of appeal decision was that constitutional changes could not be passed under the parliament act of 1911. 2The legal issues raised in this case is that any legislation done under the parliament Act of 1911 was not primary, but a subordinate one. The legislative power wielded by the Act was not limited, and thus was open to statutory interpretation. Upon reaching the decision, the judges raised the issue that the Act did not authorize the House of Commons to change or remove any conditions on which the law-making power is based. 6 The judges observed that the 1911 Act was wide to authorize some amendments of the commons law making power, contrary to the 1949 Act, which was observed to be substantial and significant. 6The discussion by the judges was that it was highly unlikely that the House of Commons could contemplate to use the Act to enact a legislation that the House of Lords had not consented to or to abolish the House of Lords completely. 2 If however, the House of Commons had such intentions, then it would be seen as contrary to the intentions of the parliament, when it was enacting such legislations. This gives the opinion that the 1911 act was much ambiguous, and require situational interpretation for its effective applicability. The roots of the two legislations can be traced back to the Budgeting done in the year 1909, which proposed the taxation of lands, with the ideas that a land tax should be introduced to raise budget money. The conservatives, who were mainly the large landowners opposed the proposal and saw its downfall through the House of Lords where they wielded immense power. Consequently, there was a perceived need to limit the powers of the House of Lords, through granting the House of Commons more power, most significantly the power to pass legislations without seeking the approval of the House of Lords. 1The agenda of the refused budget proposal become the bottom-line of the 1910 elections, where the liberals sought to limit the powers of the House of the Lords, when they got back to parliament t after the elections. This was eventually to happen, a milestone that saw the power of the House of Lords, to control and scrutinize all legislations and give their approval before any legislation was passed to a law curtailed. The provisions of Parliament Acts of 1911 underlined the fact that the House of Lords no longer had powers to veto any legislation emanating from the House of Commons. The only exception granted was on the issue of extending the maximum term of the parliament from to over five years. 2 The effect of this was to scrap off the powers of the House of Lords, leaving them with only an authority to delay bills but not to reject them. They were to delay any money bill for a maximum duration of one month, and any other bill to a maximum of one-year period. The powers to determine which Bills were to be classified as money bills was also scrapped from the House of Lords and handed over to the speaker of the parliament. 6However, the act was only to affect the Bills introduced in the House of Commons, with no effect on those introduced by the House of Lords or the private Bills. There are some powers that were granted to the House of Commons through the legislation of these acts. First, if the Money Bill is presented to the House of Lords a month before the end of the session, and for whatever reason they fail to pass it without an amendment, the House of Commons obtained he power to have the Bill presented for Royal assent by the King/Queen. This is regardless of the fact that the House of Lords did not approve or pass the Bill. 1 However, the Bill had to be first certified by the speaker as a Money Bill. Second, if any other bill, other than the Money Bill or a Bill to extend the maximum term of a parliament is passed by the House of Commons, in two successive sessions, and presented to the House of Lords for approval at least a month before the end of the session, it can become a law. This is regardless of the fact that for whatever reason the House of Lords may have failed to pass the Bill. The Bill is amenable to be presented for Royal assent to become an act of parliament. This is so, unless voted to the contrary by the House of Commons. 3 All it requires is the confirmation by the speaker that all the due process has been followed in enacting the Bill. The act went on to provide for when such Royal assent should be sought, through the determination of what was to be considered a rejected Bill. The Bill is considered rejected by the House of Commons, if the House of Lords does not pass the Bill, when it has the necessary amendments agreed by both houses or when the House of Lords do not recommend any amendment, yet fails to pass the Bill in question. 4 Third, there was a provision to the effect that nothing was to diminish or qualify the existing powers and privileges of the House of Commons. 1 This was a provision to ensure that the House of Commons and the power to approve any amendment made by the house of lords, which was to do with the waiver of the privilege of that house. 4This provision further sought to strengthen and empower the House of Commons, in the standings of the House of Lords. Four, a provision to the effect that there could be no more extension of the maximum duration of a parliament beyond five years, was established. This sought to ensure that the House of Lords could not extend the duration of parliaments life beyond five years. In so doing, the general voting public, as represented by the House of Commons were to wield the power of determining the maximum term that a parliament can serve, as opposed to earlier on, When the parliament, through the House of Lords could extend its lifespan to seven years. 4All these provisions sought to empower the House of Commons, and by extension the public, who votes for the member’s o the House of Commons as their representatives. In 1949, immediately after the end of the second world war, the powers of the house of lords were sought to be limited further, through the repealing of the Parliament Acts of 1911, by the introduction of the Parliament Acts of 1949. 6 This repealing occurred due to the fear of the Labour government that the House of Lords were likely to delay the nationalization effort. This amendment of the Parliament Acts of 1911 by the 1949 parliamentary act saw the applicability of law, in a form beyond which it would not have been applied before. It formed the basis for the founding of War crime act of 1991, extending the jurisdiction of the UK courts to the acts committed on behalf of the Nazi Germany in World War II. 5 These parliament acts have been used consistently by subsequent governments to compel the Lords to approve of some legislation that they would otherwise have not assented to. Notable among these occurrences where the House of Lords have been compelled to pass the legislations is Temperance (Scotland) Act1913. 1 It allowed the voter residing in a district to determine whether the district remains dry or wet, their voting. The other good example is the Trade Unions and Labour Relations (Amendment) Act, which changed the act that was earlier made to that effect. Aircraft and Ship building Industries Act 1977, which served to nationalize a large part of the UK Aerospace and Shipbuilding industries, consequently establishing two corporations, the British Aerospace and the British Shipbuilders, is yet another legislation that was made possible by the establishment of these Acts. 5Not all these occurrences and legislations would have been possible without the enactment of the Parliament Acts of 1911 and 1949. The acts have gone a long way in making legislations that would have otherwise been rejected to be approved, mostly though a consensus of the two houses. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the validity of the Parliament act of 1949, where it has been observed as legislation dependent on another. The Act has been considered non-operational without the substance of the Parliament Acts of 1911. 2 To address this issue, a private members Bill was introduced in 2000-2001, to confirm, validate and legitimize this act. Therefore, it can be observed that the Parliament Acts of 1911 and 1949 have served a very important role in addressing the excessive powers ad authority previously held by the House of Lords. This has worked to the advantage of the House of Commons, and by extension to the public, in that some legislation and enactments that would not have been possible initially are now in place. Thus, the Parliament Acts of 1911 and 1949 are effective tools for limiting the powers of the House of Lords and empowering the House of Commons. It is therefore observed that these two acts have served to increase democracy in the United Kingdom. Works Cited 1Barnett, Hilaire, Constitutional & Administrative Law (8th ed.), New York: Taylor & Francis, 2011. p155-180. 2Bradley, Ewing, Constitutional and Administrative Law (14th ed.), Harlow, United Kingdom: Longman, 2007. p20-30. 3Ensor, Rock. England 1870–1914. The Oxford History of England. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1952.p8-56. 4Jackson, Paul. Constitutional and Administrative Law (8th ed.). London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2001. p150-170. 5Keir, David. The Constitutional History of Modern Britain. London: A & C Black, 1938.p5-10. 6Leopold, Patricia, The Parliament Acts of 1911 and 1949, London: Cavendish Pub Ltd, 2001.p11-25. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Importance of the Parliament Acts of 1911 and 1949 Assignment - 1”, n.d.)
Importance of the Parliament Acts of 1911 and 1949 Assignment - 1. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1590926-uk-constitutional-law-united-kingdom
(Importance of the Parliament Acts of 1911 and 1949 Assignment - 1)
Importance of the Parliament Acts of 1911 and 1949 Assignment - 1. https://studentshare.org/law/1590926-uk-constitutional-law-united-kingdom.
“Importance of the Parliament Acts of 1911 and 1949 Assignment - 1”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1590926-uk-constitutional-law-united-kingdom.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Importance of the Parliament Acts of 1911 and 1949

Why did the suffragette movement in London turn violent in 1908

The struggle for the rights of women had begun long before the beginning of the twentieth century.... Through much effort the women had accomplished many goals by the beginning of the twentieth century.... … Bonie and Judith (1988) mention the achievements of women in their book “A History of Their Own: Women in Europe....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Analysis of Pontecaster Car Rally Case

The paper "Analysis of Pontecaster Car Rally Case" highlights that each of the parties in the case has its responsibility to do under the contract and that fulfilment of this responsibility will lead to faithful compliance but parties are both having their argument on their side.... nbsp; … 'Grubs up' want to invoke frustration to discharge itself from the contract....
16 Pages (4000 words) Case Study

How Does the Parliamentary Act Work

This paper "How Does the Parliamentary Act Work" discusses the Parliament Acts that pertains to the two Acts of Parliament of the United Kingdom that were enacted in the years 1911 and 1949 respectively.... In this light, it could be noted that the parliament acts have been used to enact legislation which ultimately opposes the wishes of the Lords on simply 7 occasions since 1911, an example of which is the enactment of the Parliament Act 1949.... However there are still doubts put forward regarding the validity of the 1949 Act, and the members of the Countryside Alliance took a case to court to challenge the validity of the Hunting Act 2004 (Parliamentary Standard Note on the parliament acts, 2004)....
7 Pages (1750 words) Case Study

The Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949, Why Legislative Structure and Procedure Requires Reform

The paper "The Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949, Why Legislative Structure and Procedure Requires Reform" highlights that the Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949 do testify to the fact that the British polity is essentially democratic and is open to change and reforms.... nbsp;  One thing that needs to be considered is the fact that while enacting laws or while giving effect to the laws, in a way the parliament impinges on the rights and privileges of the individuals and groups by automatically conferring on these individuals and groups a wide range of responsibilities and duties....
12 Pages (3000 words) Coursework

Baltic National Movement

(Samuolyte, 2011)After formally incorporating Baltic States into USSR during 1940, Stalin unleashed a wave of terror in these states with the systematic destruction of political institutions and prosecution of the military as well as cultural persons of importance.... The paper "Baltic National Movement" discusses that history has records of murders and deportation phases conducted by Soviets in these states....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

The Constitutional Reform Act of 2005

Dicey set out the fundamental principles of Britain's unwritten constitution, and the role of judges within the context of those principles, as follows: (a) “Parliament has the right to make or unmake any law whatever”10 and (b) no person or body may be recognized as having the legal authority to set aside or invalidate the acts of Parliament, except Parliament itself.... 2 As a result, the British power of judicial review would not include the power to invalidate acts of Parliament, rather the Courts may only use their powers to constrain any abuse of powers by the other arms of Government, such as the legislative and executive branches....
6 Pages (1500 words) Coursework

Doctrine of Sovereignty and Jackson

As stated by Dicey: (a) “Parliament has the right to make or unmake any law whatever” and (b) no person or body may be recognized as having the legal authority to set aside or invalidate the acts of Parliament, except Parliament itself.... s a result, the British power of judicial review would not include the power to invalidate acts of Parliament, rather the Courts may only use their powers to constrain any abuse of powers by the other arms of Government....
6 Pages (1500 words) Case Study

Is It an Extension of Natural Right

n this jurisdiction, the rights evolution started in 1689 when the parliament enacted the Bill of Rights, otherwise known as An Act Declaring the Rights and Liberties of the Subject and Settling the Succession of the Crown.... It delineated the powers of the sovereign, the parliament including its freedom of speech, the necessity of regular elections....
10 Pages (2500 words) Dissertation
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us