StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Liability Denial in Insurance Claims - Coursework Example

Cite this document
Summary
"Liability Denial in Insurance Claims" paper examines the legal question in the care hitherto to prove whether the insurance company was justified in its denial of liability. The paper provides a succinct evaluation of the applicable laws that Mr. A can use to pursue his claim for indemnity. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.5% of users find it useful
Liability Denial in Insurance Claims
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Liability Denial in Insurance Claims"

Liability Denial in Insurance Claims: Case study of Mr. A Introduction The law of liability insurance is always controversial whenever the insurer feels prejudiced by the insurance company following the occurrence of an event against which the property was insured.1 In the case presented before us, a client herein referred to as Mr. A lost his second hand car in a burglary event when unknown person(s) drove away the car while he was unloading his electrical tools to the garage. On reporting the incident, the insurance company denied liability on ground that Mr. A failed to exercise practicable caution to remove the loss of his car. This paper therefore examines the legal question in the care hitherto with the aim to prove whether the insurance company was really justified in its denial of liability.2 Moreover, the paper provides a succinct evaluation of the applicable laws that Mr. A can use to pursue his claim for indemnity. However, the arguments presented in this case will examine both sides of the case so as to avoid biasness in unravelling the evidence and defence available to the plaintiff and defendant. Presentation of Facts From the arguments presented as a justification ground of liability denial, the defendant implied it owed the plaintiff the duty of protection. 3 It also suggested that the insured was obligated to observe all practicable measures of precaution to remove or limit the risk of loss to the insured car. Well, the plaintiff has not denied the existence of that condition. If he actually failed to comply by the aforementioned term, the defendants claim would be admissible.4 It is also imperative to consider the fact that the residence of Mr. A was generally known to have no any reasonable history of crime. Secondly, it is true that Mr. A always removed his electrician tools from the car to garage to reduce the risk of their potential loss. That act on its own is flitch too ponder. Moreover, it is clearly emerging without a doubt that there was a garage in the plaintiff’s premises. Instead, the plaintiff chose to park his car outside the garage based on the general opinion and own judgment that the area has no incidences of crime. Legal Claims Ideally, the court will agree that the parties represented case before us were legally bound by the insurance contract taken by Mr. A. Trough the policy holder, the defendant vouched its integrity to indemnify the insured in the event that he lost the property through stealing or any other form of robbery.5 However, such indemnity would only be ratified if both parties observed the terms and conditions agreed upon including reasonable exercise of precaution to remove or reduce the risk of loss to the insured second hand car. According to the defendant, Mr. A failed to comply with the prerequisite condition to remove or reduce the risk of loss. As such, it denied liability. Presentation of evidence and defence rebuttals First and foremost, prelude studies indicate that the residential area of Mr. A was of low crime rate. That on its own implied that there was potential crime in the residence anyway. Secondly, despite the fact the plaintiff lived with his mother, it has not so far been brought to the attention of this court that the plaintiff’s mother owned a car. Moreover, there is no evidence whatsoever ascertaining that there was not enough space in the said garage to accommodate Mr. A’s car. In addition, we are not told that other residents of Mr. A’s neighbourhood were also parking their cars outside their garages overnight. It seems therefore that his decision and choice to park the car outside the garage was only based on unfounded opinion. From a different point of view, the court should give the plaintiff some benefit of doubt by taking precaution not to leave his tools in the car overnight. If he had resolved to leave his tools in the car overnight, then he would ideally be increasing the risk of them being stolen. Any reasonable person would agree with that point too. Furthermore, if the residence was really safe as insinuated by unsubstantiated opinion of low crime rate, then there would be no reason at all to offload the car. However, the plaintiff confirmed the uncertainty of such opinion by taking practicable measure to reduce the loss of his tools by routinely offloading them into the garage. Deducing for the safety measure taken by Mr. A with regard to all his tools, it is rather clear that even the plaintiff himself ascertained that a car parked outside a garage is overtly predisposed to potential risk of burglary. It is further implied by the plaintiff’s action that no reasonable person would imagine when a crime would take place and what the thieves would carry away. In any case, thieves do not normal announce what they intend to steal under reasonable circumstances until the robbery has taken place as illustrated in Soole v. Royal Insurance Co. [1971] 2 Lloyd’s Rep, 332.6 Anybody would expect Mr. A to selectively offload the car and leave the rest of his tools therein. Based on experience and the observed tactic of competent attorneys, someone may want to know what item is more valuable and therefore worth securing, between a second hand car and trainee electricians tools. It is reasonably safe to believe that trainee electricians would not have gained sufficient expertise experience to handle sophisticated tools whose worth can match the price of a car. Inasmuch as that remains the case, Mr. A valued his tools and therefore took reasonable measures to reduce the risk of their loss by whatever means including overnight robbery by unknown thief or thieves, just to emphasize. Practically, a reasonable person would value that car than novice’ tools. Also, the plaintiff had made a routine of always offloading his tools from the car to the garage in multiple trips. Taking such routine into account, the plaintiff created a conspicuous pattern of insecurity even if he deemed his action as precautious. Moreover, he also painted a picture that his was deficient of security systems including anti-burglary alarm or automatic self-lock. Therefore, any interested thief would make away with the car if he could access the ignition key. Upto this point, the plaintiffs of his second hand car. Perhaps, Mr. A noticed some unfamiliar person in the neighbourhood and he failed to raise alarm. Even if that is not the case, it is unclear why he left the key in his car on the fateful evening even if he was just going to the garage. If his cautious routine of always offloading the tools from the car is anything to by, then it is reasonably unexpected for such a wary person to leave the ignition key in the car for whatever reason. With all these in mind, Mr. A’s failure to lock the car was both an implied reasonable act of negligence.7 Conclusion Lastly, the unsubstantiated sequence of events on the fateful evening perpetually confirmed that the plaintiff was negligent when he left the key in his car.8 Such connotations and personal acts of Mr. A amounted to negligence thereby compromising the agreed conditions and policy terms. To that end, we rest our case with affirmative conviction that indeed the insurance company was justified to deny liability in plaintiff’s claim for the lost car. References Bharat, S., (1991). ‘Uncertain Litigation and Liability Insurance’. Rand Journal of Economics, 22: 218-213. Birds, John. (2010). Insurance Law in the United Kingdom. London: Kluwer Law International. Doherty, G., (2007). Understanding Claim-Made liability Insurance. Woodlands Hill, CA: Poms & Associates Insurance Brokers. Harvey, B and Parry, D., (2000). The Law of Consumer Protection and Fair Trading, 6th Ed. Charlton: Butterworths. Insurance Law Service, (2010). Making claims in Car Insurance [Online]. Available at: Accessed: 23 March 2012. Merkin, R., (2007). Insurance Law: An Introduction. London: Informa Law Review. Rejda, G., (2007). Principles of Risk Management and Insurance. London: Addison Wesley Publishing. Spaulding, W., (2011). Legal Liability and Negligence: Requirements for Negligence and defences in Insurance conflicts [Online]. Available at: Accessed: 23 March 2012. Teale, J., (2008). Insurance and Risk Management. Sydney: John Wiley & Sons Australia. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Soon after starting work as a trainee electrician, Mr A bought a Coursework”, n.d.)
Soon after starting work as a trainee electrician, Mr A bought a Coursework. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1592050-soon-after-starting-work-as-a-trainee-electrician-mr-a-bought-a-second-hand-van-when-he-returned-from-work-each-evening-he-parked-outside-the-house-where-he-lived-with-his-mother-even-thought-this-was-in-a-residential-area-with-a-relatively-low-crime
(Soon After Starting Work As a Trainee Electrician, Mr A Bought a Coursework)
Soon After Starting Work As a Trainee Electrician, Mr A Bought a Coursework. https://studentshare.org/law/1592050-soon-after-starting-work-as-a-trainee-electrician-mr-a-bought-a-second-hand-van-when-he-returned-from-work-each-evening-he-parked-outside-the-house-where-he-lived-with-his-mother-even-thought-this-was-in-a-residential-area-with-a-relatively-low-crime.
“Soon After Starting Work As a Trainee Electrician, Mr A Bought a Coursework”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1592050-soon-after-starting-work-as-a-trainee-electrician-mr-a-bought-a-second-hand-van-when-he-returned-from-work-each-evening-he-parked-outside-the-house-where-he-lived-with-his-mother-even-thought-this-was-in-a-residential-area-with-a-relatively-low-crime.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Liability Denial in Insurance Claims

Property-liability insurance

Secondly, general liability insurance plan protects from claims like ‘slip and fall' or when a customer gets sick after eating food.... An employees' death on the premises raise claims, then life insurance plan addresses such liabilities towards the employer.... Property-liability insurance If you are thinking to start a new restaurant business, then you need to devise a plan in detail covering all aspects involved.... It has been experienced that, generally, new entrepreneurs having little or no experience in such type of business planning and most of the time overlooks the importance of different types of insurance plans that undermines their chances of success....
5 Pages (1250 words) Research Paper

Responsibilities of People for Injury Caused by Accidents on Private and Public Property

At the scene of the accident, Peter is also expected to; Take necessary measures to avert further collisions Not confess fault as this may abrogate insurance claims Make notes of any talk with the other person that may have been involved in the event... he covered person refers to an individual who is entitled to an insurance policy .... The covered person refers to an individual who is entitled to an insurance policy in the event of an accident....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Analysis of Hunter v Canary Wharf Case

The analysis is limited to private nuisance claims.... However, commentators have criticized the multifarious limitations in private nuisance claims, which further render inherently complex cases difficult to be brought to court with any realistic prospect of success5.... Furthermore, the decision in the case of Hunter v Canary Wharf7 renders private nuisance claims dependent upon demonstration of a proprietary interest in the land, which has fuelled academic debate regarding the decision's implications for private nuisance claims8....
9 Pages (2250 words) Case Study

Insurance industry issues: Uk and USA

Though, in this report you will get to know about the issues which are currently of importance to the UK insurance industry and make a comparison between the situations facing insurance in the UK with that facing the insurance market of USA.... here are two main classes of insurance business in the United Kingdom and United States: 'long-term insurance' and 'general insurance'.... otor insurance ...
16 Pages (4000 words) Essay

Job Application Questions

To appropriately identify whether a claim was denied in error I reference CPD/CSC desk procedures to research each denial.... 76 outline the appeal and review process for CHAMPVA for claim denials, providers and beneficiaries have one year from denial date to submit an appeal, and 90 days to submit a second level appeal after the initial appeal denial....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Tortious Liability

Great Benefit Life insurance denied Donny Black's claim because (a) he is too old to receive coverage (b) his leukemia is the result of a pre-existing condition and (c) bone marrow transplants are excluded from his policy.... The protagonist, Rudy Bayler sets up a partnership with former insurance assessor Dick Shifflet to fight the case of insurance bad faith on behalf of Donny Ray Black.... he tortious liability of the defendant is established because Rudy is able to discover that the insurance company was running a scheme that unfailingly denied ever insurance claim submitted since the year 1991, irrespective of whether or not it had merit....
6 Pages (1500 words) Assignment

Property-Liability Insurance

econdly, a general liability insurance plan protects from claims like 'slip and fall' or when a customer gets sick after eating food.... The author of the paper 'Property-Liability insurance' describes different insurance plans that are needed that not only save the owners from many problems in future but also to satisfy the requirements of the government regulatory offices and in acquiring loans from commercial banks.... They should know how to be effective in getting their money's worth that they already have paid over the years to the insurance company....
5 Pages (1250 words) Research Paper

Misrepresentation, Insurance Contracts Act

The insured needs to disclose every little detail to the insured so as to retain the validity of their capacity to make & sustain the claims in case of materialization of the events resulting into the destruction of the asset.... The paper "Misrepresentation, insurance Contracts Act" is an outstanding example of a macro and law assignment.... The owners should apply for Construction & Public Liability insurance for constructing, renovating or extending their homes (Australian Owners Builders, insurance Services, 2011)....
8 Pages (2000 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us