StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Strengths and Weaknesses of Competitive Positioning and Resourced-Based View of Strategy - Coursework Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Strengths and Weaknesses of Competitive Positioning and Resourced-Based View of Strategy" is an outstanding example of management coursework. Strategic management is also defined as the art of planning the business at all levels in order to de-risk the company. As a part of the responsibility of the higher management, strategic development and providing insights on the pathway to lead in the market place is considered to be one of the important function…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.3% of users find it useful

Extract of sample "Strengths and Weaknesses of Competitive Positioning and Resourced-Based View of Strategy"

Strategic Management Introduction Strategic management is also defined as art of planning the business at all levels in order to de-risk the company. As a part of the responsibility of the higher management, strategic development and providing insights on the path way to lead in the market place, is considered to be one of the important function. It also helps the company for focusing its energies and ensuring that the members in the organization are able work for a common goal. For leading the company towards one energy or force, it is mandatory to develop strategic management. It also makes sure that some of fundamental decisions are taken care of to meet the higher targets. Over the last decade, there have been two contrary paradigms which have been dominating the landscape of strategic management theory. While one of them has been the resource-based view wherein the organisations are constantly looking at sustaining themselves in the competitive environment through the capability of rent earning. The other paradigm being competitive positioning based view of strategy wherein the marketing strategies stress on creating external market orientation for achieving success and scoring over the competitors. This paper therefore critically discusses the similarities and differences between the resource-based view of strategy and the competitive positioning based view of strategy. Further, based on the literature, the paper identifies which school, or which aspects of each school are most relevant to the management of for-profit organisations in developed economies in the 21st century. Strengths and weaknesses of competitive positioning and resourced based view of strategy While the ability to take decisions based on research and analysis has become one of the basic components for any business today, strategy gives added advantage and helps the company move into the right direction by predicting and making plans to lead in the market place. The ability to bring together the types of economic research, industrial organisation, logic of the organisation and the strategy contributes to the resource based view of strategic management. It is complementarily to strategic positioning school, which is based upon the Bain–Mason–Scherer structure–conduct–performance paradigm and culminated in Michael Porter’s (1980) book on competitive strategy (Scherer and Ross 1990) is the main function of resource based view within the limits of its strategy. Resource based view is a fine platform where the strengths and analysis of an organisation can be analysed as per the seminal work on the concept of corporate strategy as per Andrew (1971) while on the other hand strategic positioning approach is the foundation of the threats and opportunity analysis, paying a little or no attention to the firm’s resources to react to the environment is the finest possible way, a point made previously by Wernerfelt (1984) and Barney (1995). While reputation of a business can be maintained with the strategic direction that can be adopted by the firm, some of the combination of strategic insights with competitive advantage as well as organisational insights on firm existence, have been opined by experts to become a benchmark or lead by example(Barney 1995; Wernerfelt, 1984). Most of the contributions made by the resource based perspective focus on are not wide as per the choice of individual resource as related to the unit of analysis, said Foss (1997). As per Foss the reason behind this narrowness is the tendency to logical atomism in economics and the scholars are warned for the possible dander of taking the individual resource as part of the analysis. In the situation that the relationship between complementarily and co-specialization exists among the resources, it is not the resource but the way it is grouped and their chemistry is necessary for the modest advantage. Packages of these individual resources and the way they are fitted are overlooked with the individual resource as part of the analysis. The core logic of resource-based view has a globular reasoning in the description of the relationship between rents and resources Porter indicated this before anybody else in 1994. The resource based view is circular is at its worst was pointed out by Porter being the leader of competing economics perspective. Due to the unique resources the successful firms are successful and should motivate these resources and the other authors also started to support this. Tautology critique was asked to mind and explain its origin by Foss in 1997. To compare the successful and the unsuccessful firms, Rents are often used to define a firm's critical resources and then the critical question appears, whether critical resources generate rents and the answer so heard is yes. According to Foss (1997) such unneeded reasoning is unethical methodology as RBV is made completely infalsefiable. With regards to competitive positioning, it is being defined as creating value for the organisation in the market by placing the products and services in a strategic manner. Further, such a strategy focuses on creating a niche for the organisation within the competitive landscape and delivering as per the strategy of the organisation. An efficient competitive positioning strategy include creating market profiling, understanding the growth and size of the competitors, creating customer segments, conducting competitive analysis, developing positioning strategy and developing value proposition for the product or services that needs to be delivered in the market. Once the market realizes the offerings given by the organisation and compares it with that of the competitor, it becomes easier of the organisation to garner more clients and win the trust of the customers. Such a differentiation helps in saving the money and time of the organisation as well, as the company would therefore not just concentrate on providing low price products to create a differentiation. One of the major elements of positioning strategy is that of value proposition, which essentially has three components, which include product leadership, operational excellence and customer intimacy (Hooley, Moller and Broderick 1997). While the resource-based view focuses on being cooperative to determine the strategic resources which could be accessible within an organisation, it has been found that competitive positioning is based on the differentiating product offerings that has been provided in the market to create a value for the organisation. An efficient strategy focuses on including components such as competitive analysis, value- proposition, market profile, positioning strategy and customer segmentation. All these strategies help in assisting the organisation for deploying limited resources to leverage opportunities that would help the firm to create a competitive edge in the market, which is also sustainable in nature. Further, resource-based view focuses on creating low-price strategy that helps in initiating resources such as Total Quality Management (TQM) and cost-control system. On the other hand, the positioning strategy focuses on creating superior quality branding for the organisation and requires different resource sets that include quality control, market sensing and supply chain management. Further, such a strategy is based on the concept of rapid innovation, which makes it essential for organisations to invest into product development, research and development and technical skills as well (Hooley 1988). Common and differing themes between the two schools Based on the review of the literature discussed in this paper, it has been found that the tussle between the resource-based school and competitive positioning school is not very rigid as being perceived. In fact, it could be stated that in order to create effective strategies, not only positioning is required, but it needs to be supported through relevant resource-based strategies as well. Recent studies have indicated that price leadership strategy needs resources that necessitate various cost-effective strategies and management theories, such as efficient workforce, total quality management (TQM) and manufacturing facilities (Hooley, Moller and Broderick 1997). As far as brand or product positioning is concerned, it has been found that it is one of the important core strategic marketing activities and organisations need to establish various different and distinct positions within the marketplace as well (Ries and Trout 1982). These positions might be based on premium quality, price, innovativeness and superior service (Hooley 1988). The resource-based view on the other hand focuses on the organisation’s ability for delivering as per the positioning strategy that has been developed. For instance, if the organisation is planning to become a leader in the field of customer service, it is required to develop resources that would help it in enabling or establishing its position prominently in the market. For instance, the renowned position enjoyed by the Marriott Hotel is based on the superior customer services provided by the hotel, which puts it above all in the league of hotel business. The hotel has been able to achieve such a standard through the accumulation of resources by codifying and standarising its practices over time. Some of the most prominent strategies adopted by the hotel to provide superior customer services include creating a customer oriented organisational culture and developing detailing at even the operational level of the organisation (Stalk, Evans and Schulman 1992). The resource-based strategy helps in enabling to understand the requirements of resources which further supports the positioning strategies that the organisation may focus on adopting to strengthen the firm’s position in the market. For instance, it is important to consider strategies such as implementing low price to help in focusing on TQM processes, information systems, cost control systems and skills in procurement (Hooley, Moller and Broderick 1997). On the other hand, it has been found that positioning strategy is mostly focused on superior quality and needs different sets of resources that includes quality control and assurance, reputation management, market sensing, brand management and supply chain management (Hooley, Moller and Broderick 1997). While, it has also been seen that with regards to positioning strategy it is generally based on rapid innovation which also means developing newer products and services, harnessing creative and technical skills and investing into research and development. Thus, for making a positioning strategy successful, it is required to identify resource sets that could help in growing the organisation as per the resource-based view of the firm (Grant 1991). Conclusion As discussed above, Strategy development is able to create and affirm the purpose for the organization and give it an environment and data driven facts that helps identify the critical issues at the onset. It becomes a critical path to develop a strategy that can help the company in leading into the right direction per the path envisaged and guard itself from market pressures. While, external market data and program evaluation provides data which is able to give sound decision making ability, it also helps in providing strategy that can help the company to move into the best direction possible. If no information and insights are to be provided or looked after, the business may not be able to alignment itself from the market pressure and may not be able to sustain the business in the long run forcing it to look for alternatives. Thus, an effective channelization of thoughts and strategy can lead the company into the right direction and help them to envisage the path in the industry by planning and forecasting correctly (Grant 1991). References Andrews, K. (1971). The Concept of Corporate Strategy. Dow Jones-Irwin: Homewood, IL. Barney, J.B. (1995). Looking inside for competitive advantage. Academy of Management Executive 9(4): 49–61. Foss NJ (ed.). (1997). Resources, Firms and Strategies. Oxford University Press: Oxford. Grant, R. M. (1991). "The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation." California Management Review. 33 (Spring): 114-135. Hooley, G. (1988). ‘Competitive positioning.’ in The CIM Handbook of Strategic Marketing. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. 121-139. Hooley, G., Moller, K and Broderick, A. (1997). "Competitive positioning and the resource-based view of the firm." Aston Business School Research Paper Series. Porter M. (1980). Competitive Strategy. Free Press: New York. Scherer, F. and Ross, D. (1990). Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. Houghton-Mifflin: Boston, MA. Stalk, G., Evans, P. and Schulman, L. E. (1992). "Competing on capabilities: The new rules of corporate strategy." Harvard Business Review. 70 (March-April): 57-69. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5(2): 171–180. Read More
Tags
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Strengths and Weaknesses of Competitive Positioning and Coursework, n.d.)
Strengths and Weaknesses of Competitive Positioning and Coursework. https://studentshare.org/management/2077792-strategic-management
(Strengths and Weaknesses of Competitive Positioning and Coursework)
Strengths and Weaknesses of Competitive Positioning and Coursework. https://studentshare.org/management/2077792-strategic-management.
“Strengths and Weaknesses of Competitive Positioning and Coursework”. https://studentshare.org/management/2077792-strategic-management.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Strengths and Weaknesses of Competitive Positioning and Resourced-Based View of Strategy

Source-Based and Competitive Positioning Based Views of Strategy - Similarities and Differences

… Question 1Strengths of Resourced Based view of strategy A company's resources that are of value and in-imitable can contribute to the effectiveness and efficiency of a firm if properly utilized (Becerra 2008, p.... The other strength of a Question 1Strengths of Resourced Based view of strategy A company's resources that are of value and in-imitable can contribute to the effectiveness and efficiency of a firm if properly utilized (Becerra 2008, p.... Weaknesses of Resourced Based view of strategy It is usually hard to determine and protect company's useful resources that can lead to competitive advantage in the market place....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Strategic Management and Sustained Competitive Advantage

competitive positioning; a Journal Review The resource-based strategy relies on superiority of wherewithal as well as the firm's capabilities, which create a value-added benefit to the consumer.... The competitive positioning theory, on the other hand, fosters the notion that maximizing earnings in the long term, and maintaining the upper hand with competitors, is the main purpose of commerce.... According to the Western New England Law Review, resource-based strategy embodies resources that are specific to that firm and should be precious, unusual, matchless, non-tradable (or traded in inadequate dynamic markets), and non-replaceable, in order to produce Ricardian rents....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Strengths and Weaknesses of Resource-Based View and Competitive Positioning View of Strategy

… The paper 'strengths and weaknesses of Resource-Based View and Competitive Positioning View of Strategy" is a good example of business coursework.... The paper 'strengths and weaknesses of Resource-Based View and Competitive Positioning View of Strategy" is a good example of business coursework.... The resource-based strategy has its own strengths that keep ahead of other models.... This model emphasizes that what differentiate one firm from another is in the way they allocate resource which is valuable to the firm, rare which means that they can deliver a unique strategy against the other firms, inimitable that means that other company cannot easily imitate them and are non-substitutable....
7 Pages (1750 words) Coursework

Resource-Based View of Strategy and the Competitive Positioning Based View of Strategy

Review of literature This section includes a review of journals discussing the strengths and weaknesses of each school of thought.... … The paper 'Resource-Based view of strategy and the Competitive Positioning Based view of strategy' is a perfect example of a Business Case Study.... A number of subsequent studies have attempted to compare resource-based view and competitive based view of strategy; with some suggesting the use of both strategies in order to minimize risk emanating from each while maximizing the benefits....
7 Pages (1750 words) Case Study

Strategic Management Issues

This paper discusses the two approaches: competitive positioning and the resource-based view of strategy, and critically evaluates the similarities and differences between them.... On the other hand, the resource-based view of strategy emphasizes the importance of the organization's resources and competencies in determining its performance.... According to Botten (1999), the resource-based view of strategy focuses on the internal resources and capabilities of the organization....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

IKEAs Competitive Behavior

This paper is aimed at discussing in details the subject of competitive behavior and how IKEA has survived in this challenging business environment.... In particular, it will explore IKEA's competitive standing against a background of generic competitive strategy models.... Part four gives a SWOT analysis of IKEA followed by the fifth part which gives key management strategies adopted by IKEA with special emphasis on competitive advantage as well as a generic competitive strategy....
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study

Resourced-Based View of Strategy and Competitive Positioning-Based View of Strategy

… The paper "resourced-based view of strategy and Competitive Positioning-Based View of Strategy" is a perfect example of management coursework.... The paper "resourced-based view of strategy and Competitive Positioning-Based View of Strategy" is a perfect example of management coursework.... There are various firms that view the strategies, the common ones include the competitive based view of strategy, institution-based view of strategy, and the resource-based view of strategy....
8 Pages (2000 words) Coursework

Market an Australian Branded Wine Into a Foreign Market

Strategic Marketing Focus and Plan It is a strategy that delineates the aspirations of an organization's management for strategic business operations in the future.... To capture the top end niche segment of the market that buys luxury and high-quality wine, average individual who is a need and able to afford competitive priced alcoholic and nonalcoholic products and a youthful section of the population.... The company's Core competencies and Sustainable competitive Advantage The success relies on how a firm exploits its core competencies in terms of tangible and intangible assets....
9 Pages (2250 words)
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us