StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Building Supply Chain Relationships - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
There is a broad range of characteristics highlighted for each of the eight examples covered in the case. The buyer-supplier relationships are characterized mainly as being short-term or long-term…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.9% of users find it useful
Building Supply Chain Relationships
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Building Supply Chain Relationships"

CASE: “Building Supply Chain Relationships” CASE QUESTIONS What are the characteristics of different types of buyer-supplier relationships and how do they differ from each other? There is a broad range of characteristics highlighted for each of the eight examples covered in the case. The buyer-supplier relationships are characterized mainly as being short-term or long-term [1]. They may also be characterized from a different perspective as being partnership like relationships or relationships which are closer to open markets. Some examples in the case lie between these relationships i.e. they are not even characterized as having extremely long-term or extremely short-term relationships. These two characteristics differ in the point that mostly short-term relationships are the kind that was employed in GM, Microsoft, Hollywood motion picture industry and the Hong Kong container terminals. GM and Microsoft were extreme examples of having a short-term buyer-supplier relationship. These relationships were more of an adversarial, non-interfering and “live and let live” kind of buyer-supplier relationships. There was less face to face interaction, less trust and there existed less commitment for the supplier to the buyer and vice versa. Only information that was necessary was communicated. The result of such relationships was simply that the suppliers tended to keep their best ideas for the companies who value the suppliers. There existed an open market for the suppliers. On the side of buyers, the buyers would go for any supplier who has an outstanding reputation in the international market or the supplier that has got the lowest bid. These kind of relationships while having a negative aspect but the companies were able to make profits. Why was it so? The reason to this is explained in the second question. On the other hand long-term relationships were those that were practiced in Toyota, Prato Wool Textile Industry, Airbus and Acer group. These relationships are based on trust, bilateral dependence and mutual friendship and are a more partnership like. There existed more face to face communication, continuous feedback, more collaboration and a high level of commitment from both sides. There is a lot of information sharing in long-term relationships which tends to enhance the level of trust between the buyer and the supplier. The long-term buyer-supplier relationships result in long-term contracts between the parties, fragmentation of processes which enhanced performance, structured and standardized policies and processes for the suppliers so that the supply chain process can be managed and monitored properly. In long-term buyer-supplier relationships, there is a more room for corrective measures and improvements. This is because the same suppliers were present so their performance can be gauged properly. The different characteristics differ in terms of the way of dealings that the buyer does with the supplier and the supplier response. Different characteristics of the buyer-supplier relationships differ mainly because of the profits that are made by both the buyer and the suppliers [2]. 2. Which type is the best approach to buyer-supplier relationship and why? The best approach to buyer-supplier relationships must be determined on the basis of the advantages that both the parties seek form the relationship, the profits that both make and the market reputation and the market reputation that they gain by being part of the relationship. The benefit that the buyer-supplier gains through their relationship is the factor on which the best approach to buyer-supplier relationship can be determined. As we examine the examples presented in the case, we predict that there exists no one best approach to buyer-supplier relationships [3]. This is because, after examining the characteristics of each of the buyer-supplier relationships and the benefits and the profits they achieve as being part of the relationship does not determines their practice as being not the best or worst. For example, the adversarial behavior of GM with its suppliers is predominantly not fair and even the suppliers don’t like it but that does not effect GM’s profits or its standing in the market. Rather GM is a market leader. Does that prove that having an adversarial behavior is a good practice? Of course not! The same example of having a short-term relationship of Hollywood Motion picture Industry on the other hand was making it difficult for the production houses to hire a different team for each project. Even Microsoft’s relationships with its suppliers were not good but still it is maintaining almost a monopoly in the market. Same is the case for Hong Kong container terminals that after having a short-term buyer-supplier relationship have the highest share in the market. However, in general terms, we can suggest that the buyer-supplier relationship that existed of Toyota and its suppliers is the best. As in spite of the reduction in costs due to the selling off automotive parts on the internet, Toyota preferred to have a face-to-face communication and meeting with its suppliers. This resulted not in a high level of profits for Toyota but it did give Toyota loyal suppliers who were ready to supply Toyota at crucial times and resulted in long-term relationships and contracts with the suppliers. Thus, the best approach to buyer-supplier relationship is the proper management of any kind of relationship that the buyer has with the suppliers [3]. Each kind of relationship should be managed individually in a way that is appropriate in particular to that specific relationship. Thus proper management is needed in any kind of buyer-supplier relationships. This approach can result in not necessarily having partnership with the suppliers nor even to have an open market for the suppliers. It is therefore, important to understand the nature of the buyer-supplier relationships and deal with each relationship individually. The buyers and suppliers both use different strategies and manage in different ways each other’s relationships. Either the buyer-supplier relationship is short-term or long-term, it can be well managed to achieve greater profits and benefits. 3. In which direction do you think buyer-supplier relationship is likely to move in the future? In the future, the buyer-supplier relationships will take more kind of a long-term relationship but not necessarily the short-term buyer-supplier relationships will disappear completely. The trend will more be towards managing proper relationships with the suppliers irrespective of the fact if it is short-term or long-term. This is because it is the suppliers who are the main factor the buyers depend on to decrease their costs. At present, that will continue in future, due to the increasing towards globalization, advancement of technology and growth of the industries and thus the competition, every company wants to maintain or either increase its market share. The increase in market share is possible only if there are more profits for the company and the customers are able to get their products at lower prices and the best quality. There is an extreme emphasis on quality at present, which will continue to grow in future. More collabrative approach between the buyer-supplier relationships will continue to increase in the future. The global competition across the different countries is continuing to grow at a very fast pace in the future that s making the processes involved in businesses more and more complex in nature and is increasing the cost for businesses to do the businesses all by themselves [4]. The suppliers are important sources for the companies in order to mange their businesses. Therefore it is important for each and every company to manage good relationships with its suppliers if it expects to survive in the continuously growing market. The companies need to focus on their core business to achieve success. Whether the buyer-supplier relationships are long-term or short-term, they offer different benefits to the companies in different ways. This is the reason why it is selected as a best approach and emphasized to pay prop attention to the management of the relationship with the suppliers. Unless the companies do not achieve better relationships with their suppliers, they will no be able to survive in the competitive upcoming future. BIBLIORGRAPHY: [1] Shan Wang and Norm Archer. “Strategic Choice of Electronic Marketplace Functionalities: A Buyer-Supplier Relationship Perspective”. 16 June 2007 . [2] Jai-Beom Kim and Paul Michell. “Relationship marketing in Japan: The Buyer-Supplier Relationships of Four Automakers”. 1999. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. pp.118-130. 16 June 2007 . [3] M. Bensaou. “Portfolios of Buyer-Supplier Relationships”. 1999. Operations Management and Research. 16 June 2007 . [4] Marjolein C.J. Caniëls and Cees J. Gelderman. “Buyer-Supplier Relationship Development – Empirical Identification and Quantification”. 2004. 16 June 2007 . Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Building Supply Chain Relationships Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/marketing/1541212-building-supply-chain-relationships
(Building Supply Chain Relationships Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
https://studentshare.org/marketing/1541212-building-supply-chain-relationships.
“Building Supply Chain Relationships Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/marketing/1541212-building-supply-chain-relationships.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Building Supply Chain Relationships

Mainstream Approaches to Supply Chain Management

Date 1) Mainstream approaches of SCM supply chain management is the integration and the management of all the supply chains organization and activities through corporative organizational relationships, effective business processes and high levels of information sharing to create a high performing value system that provide the member organizations a sustainable competitive advantage.... hellip; Hence SCM gives a great focus on management of relationships as a means of arriving at better results for all the members of a supply chain including customers (Neef, 2004)....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Marketing E-Business

How can Internet-based technologies be used to automate the supply chain?... nbsp;… Automation of replenishment is the perfect procedure for supply chain management.... To manage the supply chain is a complicated and healthy procedure which includes vendor certification, requisition preparation and approval, order placement, goods receipts and etc.... The cost and difficulties in the supply chain have increased because every day new products are coming and obsolescing within a few months....
9 Pages (2250 words) Research Paper

Supply chain management in the uk construction Industry

The term ‘supply chain' has been used to describe the links that exists among companies in terms of raw materials, products and services (Constructing Excellence, 2004).... The Association of Operations Management has defined ‘supply chain' as “the global network used to… eliver products and services from raw materials to end customers through an engineered flow of information, physical distribution and cash” (Council of supply chain Management Professionals, n....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Supply Chains with a Focus on Customer Value

supply chain management excellence is crucial to customer satisfaction; consequently, customer satisfaction is critical to customer loyalty, and loyalty critical to profitability (Reichheld 1996 cited in Flint et al.... supply chain learning should be a part of the firms' strategies to address customer satisfaction and loyalty.... “supply chain efficiency is measured as a cost of producing and delivering goods and service to the customer....
14 Pages (3500 words) Essay

Role of International Supply Chain between Organizations

International supply chain management can be stated as effective management of goods flow in global context.... … This approach can be further defined as designing, execution, planning, monitoring and controlling of various supply chain activities.... The major objective of international supply chain management is to create value, develop a competitive structure, leveraging logistics across the globe, bringing forth synchronization between demand and supply, and measuring the overall performance globally....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

The most important concepts in the business-supply chain relationship

The processes involved in the supply chain require the application of certain… Suppliers and producers must have the necessary infrastructure to support the delivery and manufacture of goods so that the supply chain operates optimally at all times.... The supply Module The Most Important Concepts in the Business-supply chain Relationship Businesses have a special relationship with their suppliers, and this exclusivity is borne out of the unique operations they have to conduct either collaboratively or independently of each other....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

The Realization of Supply Chain Collaboration

There are numerous reasons for disruptions and since a supply chain is long, the uncertainties are bound to occur more frequently… While it has been suggested that the complexity triangle helps to resolve some issues by understanding the problem, highlighting it and offering avenues of improvements for reducing uncertainties; an alternative in the shape of Participatory Collaboration has been suggested to eliminate uncertainties of the supply chain It has been established that poor management of the supply chain results in a staggering loss of A definition by Cooper et al (1997) is that three or more organizationally distinct handlers of products, where products include physical goods, services, and information, make a supply chain....
24 Pages (6000 words) Term Paper

Logistics Global Supply Chain Management

This study describes why knowledge creation and transfer have become the need of the modern world for global supply chain management and why the continuous update of knowledge is necessary to achieve a competitive advantage in the market… The customers are now exposed to more choices and brands which raises the need for the local companies to deliver more quality products.... This phenomenon also poses some threats to supply chain management.... nbsp; Gupta and Govindarajan (2000) defined a global supply chain as a set of units in different countries that work over a network of capital, product, and knowledge transactions....
10 Pages (2500 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us