StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Fordist Production System - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "The Fordist Production System" highlights that motivation theories stem from socio-psychological theories which maintain that human behavior and actions can be managed towards the realization of specific objectives if there exists a motivation. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.3% of users find it useful
The Fordist Production System
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Fordist Production System"

I The fordist system of production effectively revolutionized production/manufacturing, redefined the relationship between laborer and labor and, to a large degree, is responsible for the evolution of the consumer culture. While it is no longer the dominant manufacturing/production system, its position of prominence having been usurped by lean and just in time manufacturing, Fordist elements may still be detected in present-day organizations. The Fordist system of production is grounded in a well-defined work philosophy whose primary focus is the relationship between worker and task and worker and machine. As per the Fordist economic and production philosophy, assembly line production technologies, such as which required individual worker dedication to single, repetitive tasks, were the key to mass production, hence economic prosperity. Assembly lines were dedicated to the production of a single thing, implying the development of dedicated machine tools and workers, operating individually rather than as a work team, were responsible for the performance of single tasks within the assembly process. The implication here is that the said philosophy is funding upon the division of a single project/process into its constituent elements and the total dedication of man and machine to the efficient and timely execution of those single tasks. The Fordist production system, as defined in the above, reduced the cost of automobile manufacturing by 90% and led to the evolution of mass production and the associate mass consumption, and consumer culture. Although incontrovertibly efficient, however, it was not flexible and led to the accumulation of significant inventories. This, however, does not imply that the Fordist system has passed out of existence since several of its elements have been integrated into contemporary organizations and management systems. These elements are lack of specialization, as in workers and employees being able to fulfill a number of tasks if and when required, control over the business processes, efficiency predicated on the division of single projects into its constituent parts, calculability, predictability and, importantly, the organization as an efficient machine. In the final analysis, therefore, while the Fordist system of production may have been replaced by others more compatible with current requirements and realities, its philosophical elements have survived and have been integrated into organizational management. II Despite their positive impact upon production and their contribution to the evolution of more efficient and effective organizations, Taylorism and Scientific Management were, as a result of the controversy they inspired, replaced by the human relations approach to management. Following a brief overview of both, the differences between the two approaches shall be elucidated. Scientific management adopts an objective, rational approach to organizational management, such as which decentralizes socio-cultural and human factors and considerations. This approach advocates the division of labor in the production process for the attainment of maximum productivity, even as it insists upon the separation of the physical from the mental tasks. The aforementioned practices are predicated on the belief that the work process is measurable, in that the componential elements of a single process can be quantified, just as the steps involved in the completion of each can be measured. The implication here is that through the rational quantification of work process steps, the calculation of the time it tales to complete each, the work process can evolve into a semi-automatic and highly efficient phenomenon. Scientific management, as may have been determined from the preceding, marginalizes the human factor, to the extent of rendering the work process an unthinking and routinised one wherein workers are isolated one from the other. Its focus on the rational, leading to its failure to acknowledge the human factor was a source of criticism and controversy. More importantly, it is precisely within the context of the aforementioned criticisms, that the human relations approach evolved; it evolved as a reaction against the scientific, rational approach and in acknowledgement of the human factor which ultimately shapes and defines an organization and the work processes therein. It is, accordingly, possible to define as the antithesis of the scientific management approach, in that it regards the organization as a living organism and insists on the integration of soft factors into management paradigms, alongside the adoption of techniques and schemes designed to motivate employees and generate loyalty and commitment towards the organization. In final commentary upon the above, the human relations approach significantly differences from the scientific management one in that it centralizes the human and cultural factors which are marginalized by the other and defines them as the key to organizational success. III Within the context of increasing intense competition and ever-changing market trends and consumer demands, the survival of organizations became dependant upon their capacity for timely, possibly proactive, response to market demands. Taylorism and Fordism did not allow for the requisite flexibility insofar as machines and workers were dedicated to the execution of highly specific tasks, not to mention the focus on mass production. Management paradigms and production processes had to be reworked in order to afford organizations the capacity for flexibility. It is within this context that both lean and just in time philosophies arose. Flexibility, implying the capacity of both labor and products to respond to changing market requirements and trends, is at the core of the lean and JIT philosophies. As per the aforementioned, mass production is effectively eschewed in favor of production as a response to market demand, or just in time production. This ensures that the company/manufacturer does not carry a costly inventory such as which there may not be a market for. Flexibility, focusing as it does on lean management and production, is funded upon an explicit awareness of the mercurial nature of markets and consumers. That which is in demand today, whether goods, services or skills, may not be in demand tomorrow. Organizations which do not take this into account run the risk of resource wastage and effectively constrain their capacities for timely responsiveness. Lean becomes the key to resource preservation and rational allocation, on the one hand and a predicator of flexibility, on the other. Quite simply stated, lean necessitates the integration of labor skills and the design of work processes, including assembly lines, so that they can be adjusted to meet changing demands. It implies building flexibility into the business process and into employees themselves. As is apparent from the foregoing, flexibility has been imposed upon organizations by changing market requirements, on the one hand, and the impossibly mercurial nature of markets, on the other. Ultimately, flexible organizations are the more competitive ones simply because they have embraced and adopted the tools and strategies which allow for immediate/timely response to customer demands. IV Motivation theories stem from socio-psychological theories which maintain that human behavior and actions can be managed towards the realization of specific objectives if there exists a motivation. Embraced by organizations the world over, a brief overview of Maslow and Taylor's theories will illustrate how motivation theories achieve the stated and how they may be applied to organizations. Maslow's theory of motivation probably stands out as one of the more influential and widely implemented ones. In essence, Maslow argued the presence of a hierarchy of needs, these being in order of importance, physiological, safety, belonging and love, esteem and self-actualization needs. The last, self-actualization needs, assumes importance as a motivator only when the earlier mentioned needs have been fulfilled. It assumes that once basic, economic and esteem needs are fulfilled, self-actualisation, or the sense of fulfillment and satisfaction which one derives from meeting his/her objectives and realizing his/her potential, functions as a powerful motivator. In comparison, Taylor's theory of motivation looks towards more concrete motivators. Holding that man is an essentially rational creature who works for economic gain and whose ambitions invariably tend towards the economic, the Economic Man motivation theory maintains that financial incentives constitute powerful motivators. They function to satisfy an entire range of needs and, hence, represent much more than financial gain. Both of the stated motivation theories are integrated into most organizations for the explicit purpose of directing and guiding employee behaviour towards certain objectives. Self-actualization effectively translates into goal-setting behaviour, wherein employees set themselves particular objectives and upon their realization/fulfillment feel a sense satisfaction consequent to their having realized their potential. Of course, this particular motivator is complemented by promotion schemes. As regards, economic motivations, they are integrated into organizations in the form of bonus schemes, benefits and pay packages. As may have been deduced from the above paragraphs, organizations do not limit themselves to the implementation of a single motivation theory but, indeed, may adopt the motivators recommended by more than one. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“People and Organizations Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1519800-people-and-organizations
(People and Organizations Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words)
https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1519800-people-and-organizations.
“People and Organizations Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1519800-people-and-organizations.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Fordist Production System

Transition of Economic Systems: Fordism to Post-Fordism

It was later discovered that this system of production and distribution of goods has certain drawback as well.... Secondly, the goods produced using this system were too standardized and there was no place for the workers own craftsmanship and innovation.... (Sloman, 2005) The drawbacks in the Fordism lead to economic transition and the need for an improved economic production and consumption system was felt.... It evolved from change of ideologies under which the whole global political system was revamped and the new system was evolved....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

The Crisis Of Fordism

the fordist crisis was an over accumulation crisis caused by the rapid spread of the various Fordist productions methods to the Japan and Western Europe, leading to a decline of profit rate and saturation of the global markets in the... In absence of any control by national governments, the international trading system practiced by the multinationals was coordinated by the global financial markets.... Fordism is defined as a mass production of related products using a rigid mode of technology of production line with particular machines and work routines, which leads to increased productivity through intensification of labor, homogenization of the labor force and the economies of scale....
14 Pages (3500 words) Essay

Fordism and Post-Fordism

This paper represents a historical shift from the fordist methods in business to the post-Fordist methods and beyond.... Fordism refers to an economic and social system that bases itself exclusively on the ideas of Henry Ford's model of mass production.... De Grazia (2005) has defined Fordism as "the eponymous manufacturing system designed to spew out standardized, low-cost goods and afford its workers decent enough wages to buy them".... Economic approaches related to production, marketing and selling have been in constant evolution....
12 Pages (3000 words) Research Paper

Nature of the Modern Working Class Culture

This essay "Nature of the Modern Working Class Culture" reveals that the relationship between culture and social class seems to differ broadly in the world.... Thus, 'class culture' is a concept created by the debates about the changing structure of the class.... .... ... ... It is possible to relate culture and taste to social class....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Fordism and the US Economy

Fordism initially transformed simple production techniques to a more complex mass production system which spawned the economics of scale and scope.... In the 60's productivity slowed down as the fordist model of production reached its limitations as wages failed to increase and capital began to wane, worsened further by workers' fallout and union demand.... Other scholars such as Gramsci argued that the crisis brought about by the fordist form of production should be understood in its political and socio-cultural significance as this system of production was institutionalized by political legislations through which regulations with regards worker's union, wages and labor benefits were put into effect (110)....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Fordism to Post-Fordism: Revolutionising Management Models

A new system of work production arises from the 'failures' of Fordism and Taylorism, Post-Fordism or Neo-Fordism took its flight and set forth new standards for employment organization, proficiency, and machinery, allowing the system to cope with the continuously shifting market and highly technical atmosphere that is shaping the late twentieth-century global economy.... First, Fordism is a labor process, an industrial paradigm that made use of assembly line techniques for mass production, employing mass workers for mass consumption....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

The Organization of the Labor Process in Fordism and Post Fordism

enry Ford was an accepted symbol of the change from farming to industrial, mass production, mass consumption financial system.... The efficiency of production increased and this was a successful change for the effectiveness of manufacturing products with less expenditure.... Post-Fordism is founded on the supremacy of a flexible and enduringly inventive model of growth and it is based on flexible production, growing revenues for capable employees (Jessop, N....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

The Impact of Taylorism and Fordism on Management Practices

This method of management is based on Henry Ford's preferred use of mass production units to produce numerous vehicles in his corporation without necessarily requiring the labour of many workers.... ordism is characterised by the existence of strong hierarchical structures where employees labour next to each other in a singular production line.... The concept of Fordism's tends to lean on the automation of mass production processes.... For a long time, Fordism was beneficial for suited industrial corporations that were involved in the mass production of different objects....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us