StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Abolition of the Death Penalty - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The Death penalty is part of capital punishment administered by a state upon an individual who has committed certain crimes deemed serious by the state in question.It requires the life of the person in question be put to an end…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.5% of users find it useful
Abolition of the Death Penalty
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Abolition of the Death Penalty"

?Neil Rajpal Ethics Foelber 11/8/11 Abolition of the Death Penalty Introduction The Death penalty is part of capital punishment administered by a state upon an individual who has committed certain crimes deemed serious by the state in question. It requires the life of the person in question be put to an end. Means of capital punishment include but not limited to; hanging, crucifixion, electrocution, stoning etc. Van Den Haag gives five reasons justifying the constitutionality of the death penalty by concluding that the constitution allows for death penalty which is not the case (van den hag 128).The constitution states that “if life was to be taken away as form of punishment, then it must be in accordance with the due process of the law”, this proposition is conditional and accords the government a choice to either abolish it or effect it in light of the due process of the law. For this reason I wish to put forth arguments that would lead to the abolition of death penalty. Dissenting Van den hag argues that the death penalty acts as deterrence for future murders. Death being the most severe form of punishment is most feared and a murder would think before carrying out his intention. Previous studies have shown that quiet a number of murders were deterred since the introduction of death sentence. However, the death sentence takes quiet a long time before it is administered and the use of alternative equally feared forms of punishments could be used instead as a form of deterrence. Deterrence has its limitations as someone already imprisoned and sentenced for death would not be afraid to kill their inmates as well as the prison guards. Death sentence can only be effective in deterring murders if it is carried out fast enough which is usually not the case. Retributive justice comes into play when an imbalance occurs in society due to a loss of life from the hands of a criminal. That balance must be restored by taking away the murderers life. Concurring In rebuttal to deterrence, the death sentence has not been proven to deter future murders. The difference between life imprisonment and death sentence is negligible. Death sentence can have the effect of brutalizing the society, which then makes it a less effective tool for deterring murder as this increases the possibility of more murder (Anckar, 2004, 189). Most murders are committed by people in altered states of mind. It might be that a person acted in moments of immense emotional imbalance due to anger or substance abuse. Also, the person committing murder does not expect to be found out. It would be suffice to say that the death sentence cannot deter such persons or drug abusing criminals from committing murder as they are not in a position to evaluate the possibility of life imprisonment or the death penalty itself. The death penalty has not been proven to deter more murders than life imprisonment, as most prisoners serving life imprisonment are involved in routine works and like any other prisoner, they are unlikely to commit any crime. People’s security can be guaranteed by offering life sentence without parole without having to use the death penalty (Bae,2007, 235). Long-term imprisonment being a severe punishment can deter any rational human being from committing murder; however this is not possible as most premeditated murders involve a criminal who is planning on not getting caught or people who murdered out of sheer emotion.. Police in states with the death penalty are not safe compared to police officers in abolitionist states. Also, prison personnel and prisoners are not safe in states with the death penalty than those without. (Wolftson, 1982, 167) In rebuttal to retribution, Sanctity of life should not be compromised to death penalty. Retribution being akin to revenge should not be exercised by a civilized society. Capital punishment has so many problems and risks associated with it and the need for vengeance should not justify its existence. Sanctioning killing for revenge motives lowers the dignity of a mature society which is supposed to uphold the highest principles possible even when faced with a challenge of this magnitude for there is a better way of solving it without contradicting its moral principles. It has been found out that many of victim’s family’s objects to death penalty because it is vengeance regardless of how you look at it for instance; a sodomite is not sodomized in return. Thus killing a murderer is a punishment that is disproportional and its sanctioning unrealistic as the U.S. takes long in implementing it and only a few people are executed making it completely unreliable for administering justice for the victim. Life-long incarceration will ultimately bring healing to the wounded souls. Countering violence with violence can only lead to more violence. No amount of punishment can bring healing to the affected families, healing can happen gradually through time and concerted efforts from third parties. It is a tragedy to believe that life can be protected by taking away life (Wolfson, 1998, 167). The issue of executing the innocent seems to be taken lightly by those concurring where as studies have shown that for every seven people executed, an innocent mans life is lost. Errors occurring in administering the capital punishment are so numerous making its usage completely unreliable. For instance, a study showed that when cases were retried 7% of the defendants were acquitted and 80 % were not put to death. The release of the most innocent victims are facilitated by external factors such as a close scrutiny of the case by the journalists that ends up finding the actual offender. The justice system many a times have declared a person guilty but DNA testing proves the judges wrong. By handing over to the accused a life sentence without parole the likelihood of executing an innocent victim would be lowered to zero in case of an error due to irrevocable punishment (MacNair & Stephen, 2008, 176). There is also the issue of arbitrariness and discrimination where the administration of the death penalty can be skewed. It can take into account race of either the victim or defendant, quality of defense counsel and such other irrational factors. If the defendant is poor and cannot afford a highly competent lawyer who is able to conduct thorough investigation, he could end up losing his life. If a caucasian person is murdered studies have shown that there is high likelihood of passing a death sentence especially if it was carried out by an African American person than the other way around. The death penalty should be suspended until race and other arbitrary factors are resolved. When one person in a certain state receives the death sentence and another in a different state receives a life sentence, justice in that case has been arbitrarily administered. Conclusion Capital punishment does not deter murder since it is virtually impossible to point out the exact citizen who did not kill because he feared for his life. Moreover, it cannot deter crimes of passion. Thus, it is suffice to say that its deterrent effect is trivial given the relatively small number of capital sentences and huge amount of time lags between sentencing and execution. That notwithstanding, it is prone to errors and arbitrariness. Capital punishment is meant to prevent unjustified killings, a notion that is paradoxical in that the government involves itself in many omissions that threaten people’s health and safety e.g. failure to regulate greenhouse gas emissions, prevent domestic violence, control road carnage etc. All of this goes unaccounted for, as such, the government cannot claim to be protecting lives by imposing capital punishment. Both arguments for and against the death penalty have a common play field which is to protect the lives of innocent people. However, the death penalty should be abolished until all the issues discussed in this paper have been resolved. PS: Works cited Anckar, carsten.Determinants of the death penalty. N Y: Rutledge, 2004. Bae, sangmin.When the state no longer kills. Albany: State University of N Y Press, 2007. MacNair, R. M., & Stephen, Z., Consistently Opposing Killing. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2008. Van Den Haag, Ernest. "The Ultimate Punishment: A Defense." A University Review Journal, 13.4 (1986): 123-136. Wolfson, Bedau. The Death Penalty in America, 3rd Ed. "The Death Penalty: For and Against," Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 1998. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Abolition of the Death Penalty Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Abolition of the Death Penalty Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1436062-abolition-of-the-death-penalty
(Abolition of the Death Penalty Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
Abolition of the Death Penalty Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1436062-abolition-of-the-death-penalty.
“Abolition of the Death Penalty Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1436062-abolition-of-the-death-penalty.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Abolition of the Death Penalty

History of the Catholic Church on the Death Penalty

Despite of its previous position on the death penalty, the Catholic Church is now one of the most fervent advocates of the Abolition of the Death Penalty.... From a Church that supports death penalty and even administers it, it now has become a bulwark and bastion of life as it advocate for the abolishment of the death penalty and a deeper respect for the human life.... Recent position of the Catholic Church about death penalty changed to the abrogation of the death penalty....
4 Pages (1000 words) Research Paper

Worldwide View on the Death Penalty

This paper will analyze the worldwide view on the death penalty while looking at the trends that have affected obliteration of the death sentence in states that have abolished it, the movement towards global Abolition of the Death Penalty, some of the major countries who practice the death penalty, trends between pro death penalty countries.... The practice of the death penalty globally has continued to reduce in size, and use of the death penalty has also been gradually more restrained in international law....
8 Pages (2000 words) Research Paper

Death penalty

For them, those who call for the Abolition of the Death Penalty are not living in a realistic world, because its abolition is likely to increase the occurrence of terrible crimes in human societies.... The continued use of the death penalty to punish a diverse number of crimes in the modern world has come to receive praise and condemnation in equal measure.... There are some among those who support the use of the death penalty, who have gone as far as to state that not applying it on people who have committed such crimes as murder and genocide is a miscarriage of justice (Davis, 2002)....
4 Pages (1000 words) Research Paper

Preserving Death Penalty

Schabas believes this is because the advance towards civilization has changed the nature of human motivation - the author argues that the socialization and interdependence that characterize the modern era, also lead to a legal system where the promotion of ethics - and not harsh deterrence - becomes the core function of criminal law (“The Abolition of the Death Penalty”).... This shows a varied and liberal use of the death penalty; it is possible to infer from this kind of use that the barriers to putting someone to death for crime till the nineteenth century, were anything but great....
8 Pages (2000 words) Research Paper

Influence of the United Nations in Implementation of Death Penalty

TABLE OF CONTENTS Influence of the United Nations in protecting Human Rights, with regard to the Implementation of the death penalty 2 Chapter 1 – Introduction 2 United Nations 2 Functioning of the UN 4 Chapter 2 – Methodology 9 Chapter 3 – UN Commission on Human Rights 11 Other UN Bodies and Human Rights 11 UN Human Rights Council 12 Chapter 4 – United Nations and Prohibition of Death Penalty 16 Execution of the Innocent 19 In Defence of Capital Punishment 47 Chapter 5 – Conclusions & Recommendations 51 Bibliography 55 Statutes / Resolutions 55 Books / Journals 56 Cases 57 Internet Sources 58 Influence of the United Nations in protecting Human Rights, with regard to the Implementat… ion of the death penalty Chapter 1 – Introduction United Nations The UN was formed after World War II, in the year 1945....
42 Pages (10500 words) Dissertation

Contemporary Issues Paper

Those calling for the Abolition of the Death Penalty, cite its However, public opinion continues to largely support the retention of the Death Penalty in America.... Despite repeated calls by the United Nations Human Rights Commission for the global Abolition of the Death Penalty, about seventy-eight countries retain Capital Punishment as a penalty in their criminal justice systems.... hellip; Supporters of the death penalty see it as an equitable method of justice and a deterrent to crime....
7 Pages (1750 words) Research Paper

Policy and Rebuttal Model

There is an urgent need for the crafting and implementation of a ‘Comprehensive Abolition of the Death Penalty Act,' which will make the Death Penalty illegal throughout the United States.... My passionate conviction that all forms of life merit humane treatment, has made me do an in-depth study on all the facets of the death penalty and confirmed my belief that Capital Punishment has no place in a civilized society.... The most prevalent myth about the apparent efficacy of the death penalty is that it serves as a deterrent to crime....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Death Penalty Through the History

When it comes to the imposition of the death penalty, these human values are discarded.... The paper "Death Penalty Through the History" states that the death penalty represents a barbaric and uncivilised response to crime.... hellip; the death penalty involves considerable cruelty.... However, the death penalty fails to achieve these objectives.... This is due to the fact that the majority of convicts on death row are not executed....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us