StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Religion as the Foundation of Instituting Theocratic Regimes: the Connection Between Religion and Violence - Research Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper describes the emphasizing the possibility of changes and permutations in the structural relationship between religion and other components, thus indicating the extent of the dilemma of finding out the roots of violence. Religion has been the foundation of instituting theocratic regimes…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.5% of users find it useful
Religion as the Foundation of Instituting Theocratic Regimes: the Connection Between Religion and Violence
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Religion as the Foundation of Instituting Theocratic Regimes: the Connection Between Religion and Violence"

Introduction The pairing of religion with various institutions did occur in the past and is persistently continuing until today, despite of the unending progression of structural separation in Christian societies. This generally reinforces the despotism of the state and hampers the freedom and liberty of civil society, which sums up the structured religious sector (Haar & Busuttil, 2005). The objective of this paper is to emphasize the possibility of various changes and permutations in structural relationship between religion and other components, thus indicating the extent of the dilemma of finding out the roots of violence. Structural Link between Religion and Violence In the past, religion has been the foundation of instituting theocratic regimes. A theocratic regime is an institution which sanctions violence specifically because it benefits adherents of state religion and disenfranchised those followers of other faith organizations. Likewise, in a religiously diverse state if a particular religion is announced as the state religion then it has a considerable promise of becoming a source of violence, since it has a tendency to recognize itself with state policies. Moreover, if one particular religion in a religiously diverse state, specifically the mainstream religion, has a tendency to view the state as its own then there is a significant likelihood of the mainstream religion developing to be a driving force of violence (Bromley & Melton, 2002). Ultimately, the tendency of a state to disallow adherents of some marginalized religious organizations from obtaining their citizenship entitlements is also present. The classification of state citizens into occupants on the basis of their religious affiliation is the worst structural violence (Ooman, 1997). When followers of a religious organization are marginalized, specifically, viewed and treated as outcasts, violence is already involved in that process, the typical example is that of European Jews, primarily in Germany. As stated by Frederick Hertz: “Jews have been living in Germany for a very long time… and most of them were completely assimilated. Nevertheless… the Nazi regime branded them as alien… (Ooman, 1997, 14)” When a religious organization is the mainstream in at least one of a state’s province it has a tendency to identify itself as a nation-state and seeks to acquire its own autonomous state. The aim is commonly expressed through secessionist movements, which consequently be viewed as ‘against the establishment’ by the general majority religious organization resulting in violence (Bromley & Melton, 2002). Muslims, Hindus and Sikhs in the Indian subcontinent all asserted that they are sovereign nations, resulting in the division of India. As the Sikhs did not understand their aim to form an independent sovereign state, in due course they were granted a local state within the Indian federal polity. In accomplishing this, a great deal of violence has been let loose. Even though the Muslims did establish their own state, that is Pakistan, the division did not resolve the problem of the Muslims and Hindus as the adherents of both the societies are scattered all over the subcontinent of India. Hence the division only marginalized Muslims in India, and Hindus in Bangladesh and Pakistan, and this incident remains a basis of persistent violence (Haar & Busuttil, 2005). Two current instances of state creation on the basis of religious affiliation are Eritrea and Timor. The Muslim province of Eritrea is formed from Ethiopia, a Christian society; while Timor, a Christian region, is carved out of a Muslim society, India. The continuing resistance for an independent Tamil state in Sri Lanka is provoked by the religious affiliations of the factions in struggle, namely, Tamil Hindus and Sinhalese Buddhists. Even as Hindu separatists in India view Buddhism as a branch of Hinduism, and eagerly integrate Buddhists into the Hindu Rashtra design, the two faiths are in aggressive competition for Sri Lanka. Likewise, even though Muslims and Hindus are implicated in continuous clashes in the Indian subcontinent, these two faiths are pacified in Indonesia (Haar & Busuttil, 2005). The argument herein is that nothing intrinsic in religious organizations which generate violence, but once they identify themselves as independent nations and aim to establish a sovereign state, they consistently become roots of violence. The concept of the nation and the state are affixed to territory, even though the connotation of ‘territories’ differs greatly in the two concepts: for the nation the territory is a moral unit, whereas for the state it is a legal body; though the national and the citizen are anticipated to show their nationalism for the nation and their patriotism for the state, both sentiments summing up their connection to the territory (Dillon, 2003, 59). Connection to the territory through religious organization is unsustainable in the modern world due to the devolution of religion through invasion, imperialism and colonization. Some may claim that religious organizations such as Jews and Hindus have not pampered in invasion and colonialism, and normally do not enforce religious conversion, and thus they may be perceived as religions that are territorially attached (Dillon, 2003). It is enlightening to examine the Jewish context as well. In an extremely influential piece of writing Steven Grosby (2002) claims that ancient Israel was indeed an independent nation, a collective native soil of the twelve tribes with definite territorial frontiers, thus challenging the well-known notion that nationality is a limited contemporary trend. Grosby (2002) demonstrates that the Israel’s trans-tribal national attitude was that of a larger affiliation which typifies even present nations. Nevertheless, the problem emerges when he tries to define the particularity of the nation, and thus Israel, as one made up of the alleged progenies Abraham, who venerated only one God. The ancient Israelites at some point during their history became a nation when they believed that the territory of Israel in its entirety belonged to them… and only to them because Yahweh their God and the only God to be worshipped in the land (and thus, whose law was the only law to be obeyed in that land) had promised it to them (Grosby, 2002, 26). As a common portrayal of ancient Israel this statement is perhaps acceptable, but the dilemma crops up when it is employed as a context to define and depict other nations, and the present-day Israel state. Primarily, there are numerous ancient and modern nations whose whole territory is not a component of any specific religious community; also, to the degree that populations of a territory have a variety of religions they have a variety of Gods; then, if there are a variety of religions as well as Gods they could have a variety of legal structures; and lastly, if each of these Gods guarantees the whole territory to his followers and commands them to conform only to his laws, in that case human existence is destined to become vicious, violent and short; certainly, the nation will be swiftly taken to pieces (Haar & Busuttil, 2005). It is relevant at this point to allude to the establishment of the state of Israel. The Balfour Declaration in 1917 assured a homeland for the Jews, and not Israel’s state. The King-Crane Commission launched in 1919 by former US President Wilson discovered that a significant portion of the population in the land recognized for the Jewish native soil was non-Jewish, specifically Arab; subsequent to the formation of Israel the Arab inhabitants was trimmed down to a small percentage. Unavoidably, tremendous violence was drawn in this incident (Bromley & Melton, 2002). Both the Jews and the Arabs had a rightful decent claim to the land of Israel. But when religion was summoned to identify nation, and the aspiration to form a state on the basis of a distinct religious society was instigated, outbursts of violence, at times widespread and relentless, were let loose. It is evident from the discussion that the general source of, or collective ideological ancestry between, institutions of faith does not diminished violence among religions. The clashes between Semitic religions, specifically Christianity, Islam and Judaism, have been present since their foundation and are continuing. Likewise, the disagreements between Indic religions, namely Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikhism and Jainism are olden and hard-wearing. On the contrary, there are cases of religious communities from very distinct ideological contexts serenely co-existing as demonstrated in the instances of Hinduism and Islam in Indonesia as well as Hinduism, Zoroastrianism and Judaism in India (Bromley & Melton, 2002). From the discussion and arguments above it is evident that when religion is attached to the notion of nationality or nations and citizenship or states it consistently develops to be an origin of violence among religions. However, dissimilarities in dogmas and faiths also frequently fuel intra-religious violence (Haar & Busuttil, 2005). The violence which they carry out is well-known in the instances of Catholics and Protestants, Mahayana and Hinayana Buddhists, Sunnis and Shias, even though the gravity of violence differs among these religious denominations. In a number of instances the new subsidiaries are not even acknowledged by the majority organization as part of their religion. Conclusion The historicity evidence of the connection between religion and violence evidently shows that, in various parts of the globe at various historical eras all religions were or are roots of violence. Furthermore, attaching religion with the concept of nation, state and minority group is a guaranteed incitement to generate and discharge violence. Also, religious identities can be a source of violence in fusion with the notions of nation and state, with independence and capitalism, and with modernity. But ultimately, and most significantly, religion itself does not have an inherent component that could generate violence. References Bromley, D. G. & Melton, J.G. (2002). Cults, Religion and Violence. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Dillon, M. (2003). A Handbook of the Sociology of Religion. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Grosby, S. E. (2002). Biblical Ideas of Nationality: Ancient and Modern. Haar, G. T. & Busuttil, J.J. (2005). Bridge or Barrier: Religion, Violence and Visions of Peace. Boston: Brill. Ooman, T. (1997). Citizenship, Nationality and Ethnicity: Reconciling Competing Identities. Polity.     Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Not Found (#404) - StudentShare”, n.d.)
Not Found (#404) - StudentShare. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/religion-and-theology/1727055-what-is-the-connection-between-religion-and-violence
(Not Found (#404) - StudentShare)
Not Found (#404) - StudentShare. https://studentshare.org/religion-and-theology/1727055-what-is-the-connection-between-religion-and-violence.
“Not Found (#404) - StudentShare”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/religion-and-theology/1727055-what-is-the-connection-between-religion-and-violence.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Religion as the Foundation of Instituting Theocratic Regimes: the Connection Between Religion and Violence

A religious explanation/justification of violence

hellip; A popular example used for analyzing the connection between religion and violence is the Palestine/Israeli war that has been ongoing for decades (BBC News, n.... A popular example used for analyzing the connection between religion and violence is the Palestine/Israeli war that has been ongoing for decades (BBC News, n.... (2012)The Oxford handbookof religion and violence.... ) Judaism and violence: Violence and the War of Right and Wrong....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

The Role of Religion in the USA and Iraq

In many ways religion in Iraq is presently being used, both intentionally and unintentionally, as a catalyst for violence.... In the essay “The Role of religion in the USA and Iraq” the author analyzes religion, which plays an important role in both the USA and Iraq.... (2003) suggest, one of the founding principles of this Constitution is that there will be no official state religion.... The first amendment to the Constitution clearly states "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof  "....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Religion and Education

From such aspects, religion and studies have been submerged together such that people ought to learn more about the religion as they prosper through their lives (Michael Molloy, 2006).... religion and EDUCATION Introduction The world has changed a lot over the last 2 centuries as many theories have been proved wrong and many new ideashave been generated that have led to great revolutions.... From such aspects, religion and studies have been submerged together such that people ought to learn more about the religion as they prosper through their lives (Michael Molloy, 2006)....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

An Example of religion being a connection: Voodoo

In this paper, the author… s the notion of religion as a connection, taking off from a discussion on some of the problems with defining the term religion, and then proceeding with examining voodoo as a religious framework that includes the notions of connectedness and ritualism.... As a religion, it is a belief system with its own organized framework for accounting for a certain type of experience that can best be described simply as religious, as opposed to being superstitious....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Confucianism as a Notion in Religion

However, he was not determined to create a new religion, but to revive and interpret the unnamed religion of religion Confucianism is usually regarded as a system of ethical and social philosophy rather than a religion.... However, he was not determined to create a new religion, but to revive and interpret the unnamed religion of the Zhou dynasty.... Confucius believes that the basis of a unified, stable, and enduring social order is not based on nature spirits, like God, but on the rituals that lie in Zhou religion....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Religious Violence in india

This was between Hindus and Muslims, whereby from then up to date sporadic uprisings most of them being religion-based keep on recurring.... This was between Hindus and Muslims, whereby from then up to date sporadic uprisings most of them being religion-based keep on recurring.... religion, Caste, and Politics in India.... What are the conflicts between these two religions?... What is the conflicts between these two religions?...
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Learning basics about religion

The argument presented in the context ascertains that the Jewish religion is among the world's Learning Basics about religion Learning Basics about religion The “Cornerstones of Judaism” article identifies that the Israelite society comprises of devout and skeptical Jews who are born to the tribe of Judah.... The argument presented in the context ascertains that the Jewish religion is among the world's renowned religions bearing the aspect of monotheism....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Threat of Religion-Based Terrorism

However, both presently and in the past, religion has not… Many times, the source of these crimes is the tendency by religious groups to exhibit insurmountable intolerance.... This paper will use the provided case and other information in analyzing Threat of religion-Based Terrorism School Affiliation: Often, religious groups are seen as a solution to some of the social vices that seem to overwhelm the government.... However, both presently and in the past, religion has not been free form blame for some of the most shocking atrocities committed against other humans....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us