StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Understanding of Social Cognition - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
This essay "The Understanding of Social Cognition" talks about the research designs, methodologies, and other commonalities that are usually employed in experimental researches. It also evaluates the contributions of these experimental researches. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.3% of users find it useful
The Understanding of Social Cognition
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Understanding of Social Cognition"

Schedule: The Contribution of Experimental Approaches in Informing our Understanding of Social Cognition Overview What distinguishes psychologists from other people is their level of skepticism and critical evaluation of things. Psychologists do not assume they have definite answers to an individuals’ behavior or that they ever will. But they do believe that they can learn so much more about cognition, personality and behavior if they persist on asking questions, making observations and studying them systematically. One of the most common approaches in studying social cognition, perception and attribution is experimental research. These are often used to test hypothesis about cause-and-effect relationships of the independent and dependent variables in an experimental group. Experimental researchers deploy methods and strategies in a controlled situation to observe reactions and behaviors in an attempt to explain the diverse and complex human behavior. This essay talks about the research designs, methodologies, and other commonalities that are usually employed in experimental researches. Moreover, this paper will also evaluate the contributions of these experimental researches in our everyday understanding of social cognition, the way people perceive, understand and explain events and situations in the social environment. Experimental approaches to social cognition: Schematic Processing and Attribution One of the most direct ways to learn about behavior is to listen and watch- observing how individuals’ behave in a given situation. According to Heider (1958) in order to understand social behavior we must pay attention to how people perceive and struggle to make sense of their social worlds, usually in terms of cause and effect. People learn about things through observing and interacting with others, they see how their actions affect other people around them. Along with our differences in cognition and knowledge are our differences in social perception. We interpret our observations through schema, a mental structure containing knowledge relating to a particular kind of subject and the social perception of how things usually happen in the social world. An experiment conducted by Rusher et al. (2000) provided an example of schematic processing. In this experiment, a group of students were observed as to the extent of stereotypical impressions versus their motivational relevance. The student participants were presented with a fictional task that involved monetary reward. There were two groups for the experiment, paired and individual participants. The task was simple, they were to make an impression of a person basing on the cards that describe that particular person’s attributes. It was found out that the pairs tend to evaluate the cards more carefully before they make a more accurate impression as compared to those who individually assess the descriptive cards. This was because the monetary reward for those in pairs depends how accurate both their impression will be compared to the participant who have to make an impression alone and still get the reward. The researchers concluded that motivational relevance does indeed play a part in social perception and leads perceivers to form impressions that are not simply based on stereotypical characteristics. Another social cognition experiment, the attribution theory, precedes that internal and external motivators are the main determinant in understanding a person’s behavior. It further postulates that certain behaviors are explained and interpreted through these factors and that internal and external motivators represent an aspect of causality (Heider, 1958). It suggests that the conclusions we draw about people vary according to whether we attribute their actions to their qualities or to the situation in which they find themselves and the more a person attributes internal factors are the causality of behavior, the less likely he is to account other external factors. In an experiment designed by Storms, (1973) he revealed the nature and causes of the actor/observer effect. He concluded that social perspectives will lead to a change in causal explanations of a person in a given situation. In his experiment, he demonstrated the evidence of Fundamental Attribution Error and Actor/Observer Effect among the participants. His experiment was to investigate the nature and causes of the actor/observer effect among the participants. This experiment involved groups of four participants given the role of actors, and observers, each being asked to observe one of the actors while they were conversing and was being videotaped. In the experimental condition the participants were told that the videotape of one of the actors was faulty when their conversation ended while the control conditions were told that both tapes were faulty. The overall findings showed that actors tended to favor situational explanations of their behavior whereas observers tended to favor dispositional explanations of the same behavior. As for the actors, their perception was not internal as it was the situation that brought along the behavior. With these, Storms concluded that because there was a change in the participants’ perceptual perspective, their reactions were no longer internal as these were already attributed to the situation that was presented to them leading to a change in their causal explanations. Commonalities of the studies: Designs, Method, and Results Experimental studies usually employ methods and techniques that are much simpler and much more straightforward than it actually is. The behaviors that are being observed in the everyday life are taken inside the laboratory to be tested for consistency and applicability. The real life complexity of human behaviors is therefore simplified and sometimes do not adequately reflect the nature of judgmental tasks as people actually encounter them in everyday life. This is the case of ecological validity- the presence of an observer or the mere knowledge that subjects are being observed will, on some extent, have effects on the results of the study. Under observation, people are apt to please or impress others, to act as they think they are expected to act. Although the control group helps correct this issue, it does not, however eliminates the problem on ecological validity as findings from laboratory studies can sometimes be different from those in social environment because the experience of the task in the laboratory is, by definition, different from what it would have been in the everyday life. Another aspect to consider in experimental research is the risk perception. Risk includes subjective estimates of the probability of what might happen, and subjective evaluations and feelings about the outcome. In doing experimental research, it is not always expected that results are directional because regardless of the extent of an individuals’ predictability, there still remains the complexity of each human experience. As researches and studies may give calculations on possible outcome of a certain behavior, for example, people will still tend to look at the other way. A good example of this is the risk involved in cigarette smoking. Even when calculations about the risk of dying early for people who smoke is generated, a lot of them still smoke cigarette. An example of risk estimate was prevalent in the study conducted by Taylor et al (1992) over the widespread sense of personal invulnerability particularly towards the people who considers the risk of HIV/AIDS. In this study, they found out that the men in the sample who knew they were HIV positive were significantly more optimistic about not developing AIDS than the men who knew they did not have HIV. Another research however suggested that it was not always the case. In a similar study, researcher Weinstein found out that the more severe an event is felt the less optimistic a bias it evokes and further suggests that people’s personal bias and irrationality play a major role in risk perception (Mapping psychology; pp 90). Conclusions Experimental approaches and studies have major contribution in our understanding of human social cognition. The results of their laboratory experiments and observations provided us with insights on the very diverse and complex human behavior. Although human behavior is generally unpredictable, the results of the experimental studies and researches gave us the main grip on the tendencies of social behavior that are helpful in explaining why people behave, think, and act the way they usually do. It helps us see the bigger picture in terms of the cause-and-effect of a certain experiment that addresses our concerns on social cognition. But then again, given the fact that human experience is entirely complex and constantly changes from over time, these experimental approaches do not have the definite, matter-of-fact answers to our everyday questions about social cognition. As there are strengths in the experimental studies, there are also weaknesses. And for this fact, many psychological researches and studies have been replicated in an attempt to find commonality among the observed behaviors. Even with the primary goal of producing the closest results, experimental approaches are not free from numerous pitfalls that trap the study into mistakes. Psychologists are only human and no matter how objective they seem to be in their research, there is still a chance that they will find what they intended to find, unwittingly overlooking other contrary evidence. And the research-participants, on the other hand, are complex people, with attitudes, feelings, and ideas of their own that are not controlled even with the presence of the experimenter. Human beings have different versions of rationality. One cannot make people to operate in a prescribed way because people do not always operate as scientists, they are not rational the way that was expected. Human as we are, we have own conceptualizations of life and we are rational in terms of how we associate meanings, cultural processes and the functions that our perceptions serve but our actions and behaviors are not always predictable. The theories and models which these experimental studies have set serve as the explanation for the structure of human behavior and enable us to make relatively accurate predictions that can be used for future studies and reference. They gauge and enhance our understanding of how people perceive and behave in the social world, contributing to our understanding of social cognition. References Gormly, Ann V. Understanding Psychology. New York. Random House: 1993. Print. Heider, F. (1958) The psychology of interpersonal relations, New York, Wiley Joffe, H. (1999) Risk and the other, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press The open university. (2007) Mapping psychology, United Kingdom, CP. . Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(The Understanding of Social Cognition Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words, n.d.)
The Understanding of Social Cognition Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words. https://studentshare.org/sociology/1734319-evaluate-the-contribution-of-experimental-approaches-in-informing-our-understanding-of-social-cognition
(The Understanding of Social Cognition Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
The Understanding of Social Cognition Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words. https://studentshare.org/sociology/1734319-evaluate-the-contribution-of-experimental-approaches-in-informing-our-understanding-of-social-cognition.
“The Understanding of Social Cognition Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”. https://studentshare.org/sociology/1734319-evaluate-the-contribution-of-experimental-approaches-in-informing-our-understanding-of-social-cognition.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Understanding of Social Cognition

The Standard Model of Information Processing

social and Cognitive Bases of Behavior Name: Introduction: Question # 1 The standard model of information processing is the most widely used.... The model is based on the original work of Atkinson and Shiffrin.... The theory hypothesized that new information has to be received and manipulated before it is stored (Craik & Lockhart, 2008)....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Research Methods, Social Cognition, and Social Perception

Research Methods, social cognition, Social Perception Name Institution Research Methods, social cognition, Social Perception Question 1 The study where a researcher would be interested in measuring the relationship between two social phenomena would entail attempting to understand the relationship between children who watch wrestling and their aggression personality (Reis & Judd, 2000).... ?This will entail adopting survey technique in which the respondents are asked information about their social behaviour....
4 Pages (1000 words) Assignment

Social Cognition, Social Perception, and Social Influences

The social part of social cognition is concerned with the real world issues and how perception is involved with the way in which the world is constructed in the mind.... You'll get to know how social cognition, social perception, and social influences can affect one's behavior, decision making, and emotions; how groups interact and how they influence the group and individual behavior; will tell about social perception as the act of creating a presence.... hellip; social cognition can be defined as “the conviction that constructs relative to cognitive representation and process are fundamental to understanding all human responses, regardless of whether those responses are social or nonsocial in nature”....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Radiality as a Comprehensive Behavioral Model

This method of interpretation contributes no less to our understanding of social relationships.... Methods of radiality modeling result in a broader understanding of social relationships with respect to language (Bennardo 2008).... ow does radiality impact our understanding of social relationships It does so by providing a method of understanding for describing how language influences cognition and social behavior.... Looking for a cultural model of social relationships in Tongan, investigators collected linguistic, experimental, and social network data....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Developmental Disorders

Though they have a good grasp of language skills, despite the slow beginning, their knowledge and understanding of the outer world is generally very low.... The spatial cognition of these people have been found to be very poor as they often lack organizing ability and have difficulty in arranging things in the right order.... The condition is generally heterogeneous as the clinical features and behavioral… ns vary from one autistic child to another and the symptoms of certain other disorders such as Rett's and Asperger's disorder often overlap with that of autism. The key clinical features that are identified as the child grows include, abnormal social interaction such as Autism Autism is a neurodevelopmental disorder with abnormal social, cognitive, emotional and communicative behavior....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Important of Cognition for Interpretation of a Particular Situation

In the past, the understanding of cognitive process was explosive and introduced various theories in the domains of problem solving, language, attention and perception (Whorf, 1956).... understanding of human behavior and emotions was possible through the interpretation of people interconnectedness with the environment.... cognition process operates at every waking moment and is part of human intelligence and personality through, which people interact socially....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Social and Cognitive Bases of Behavior

This assignment "social and Cognitive Bases of Behavior" presents the standard model of information processing as the most widely used.... The model is based on the original work of Atkinson and Shiffrin.... The theory hypothesized that new information has to be received before it is stored....
5 Pages (1250 words) Assignment

Social Cognition within a Family - Relatives Should Be Understood without Words

nbsp; The study of social cognition within a family includes understanding the elements conversation beyond verbal cues.... Therefore, the study and the understanding of self, through the contribution of social cognition, in regards to these practices within a family helps in the understanding of other family members and provides a great conflict resolution mechanism.... The topic of social cognition within a family is a significant subject to the body of psychology as it helps the learners and their beneficiaries connect with the environment and understand that environment....
1 Pages (250 words) Term Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us